AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Charles Gamble

MATH110 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid if you need clear lectures or useful help in MATH110.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerNervous LecturerUnclear HelpMumblesSkips Steps
  • Both reviews rate quality 1 and difficulty 5
  • Nervous delivery, mumbling, and
  • Students say and class interaction is poor

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Both rate difficulty 5 with no grades reported and no signs of .

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Maximum difficulty ratings and comments about skipped steps and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; the other said it was mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Both reviews give quality 1 and describe unhelpful, nervous teaching with no desire to return.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

No grade data and max .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Difficulty 5 math with skipped steps implies heavy mental load even if .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Consistent reports of nervousness, mumbling, skipped steps, and ineffective help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Math course context with no .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH110 with consistently poor teaching: , and unhelpful according to both students.

Main concern

, and little useful help when asked.

What students said

“when asked for help ”
MATH110
“mumbles alot, seems nervous, dosent address the class, gets lost in his thoughts, skips steps”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , but the hard in-person math setting is not student-friendly.

In-person math course

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews ; teaching quality issues dominate.

In-person MATH110
“skips steps”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“mumbles alot, seems nervous, dosent address the class, gets lost in his thoughts, skips steps”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 highly consistent negative in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Disaster

12/100

“mumbles alot, seems nervous, dosent address the class, gets lost in his thoughts, skips steps”

🆘 Unhelpful Support

15/100

“when asked for help ”

🚫

10/100

“He does interact with the class at all, always nervous in front of the class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always nervous in front of the class
  • mumbles alot
  • skips steps
  • gets lost in his thoughts

Theme 2

🆘 About Getting Help

  • when asked for help
  • dosent address the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Two highly consistent negative reviews from early 2016, but sample size is small and grades are missing.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values