AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Paul Goulart

MATH · MATH88 · MATH6111 · MATH160 · MATH170 · MATH178 · MATH103 · MATH90 · CAL520 · MATH090 · MATH110 · MATH180 · MATH175 · STATS · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can teach yourself around .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesHarsh TestsSarcastic AttitudeExam-HeavyHigh Drop Rate
  • Many students say gap.
  • and are often called unfair or far harder than class examples.
  • A minority like his humor and one-on-one help, especially in lower-level math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong math students report Cs and and graded harshly.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty is high for the level taught, with rushed hard problems and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Students warn not to miss class because and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

Most voices say take someone else; positive notes .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tests count heavily and several students call grading harsh or unfair after classwide fails.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

; the and difficulty.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Knowledgeable but , and frustrating when answering questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Students say there while .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math sections are polarizing but lean negative: , and .

Main concern

and weak explanations leave many .

What students said

“he doesnt do a good job of explaining things.”
MATH160
“He grades very harshly and puts things on exams that we have not ever taught us.”
MATH178
“ .”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and frequently described as unfair.

Hard In-Person TestsExam-Heavy GradingHarder Than Examples

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes include material students say was never taught.

Hard In-Person TestsExam-Heavy GradingHarder Than Examples
“yes there is not much work but and they are not easy.”
MATH160
“puts things on exams that we have not ever taught us.”
MATH178

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a brilliant math wiz, but unfortunately does not relay the information to his students effectively.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 in-person reviews, highlighting exam stress and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

36/100

“ hard stuff, leaves things out.”

📝

28/100

“ , and .”

👎 Recommendation

26/100

“ .”

🙂 Minority Praise

70/100

“Paul is an exceptional instructor. His method of teaching is a sucess.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not an easy class.
  • SARCASTIC! .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I've NEVER not gotten an A in any math class & got a C in his!!!
  • More than 75% of the class falled
  • I got an A in the class . . but i'm not sure how!

Theme 3

😡 About Attitude

  • Likes to let you know he's smarter than the class.
  • He was rude and cocky!
  • mocks students for not already knowing what he is about to teach.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-seven in-person reviews over many years show consistent complaints about clarity and .

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 58
3 out of 51
2 out of 512
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH16010 reviews
MATH1105 reviews
MATH1804 reviews
MATH1033 reviews
MATH2 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH1702 reviews
MATH1752 reviews
MATH1782 reviews
MATH902 reviews
CAL5201 review
MATH0901 review
MATH61111 review
MATH881 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values