AI Rate Professor

English

Tarah Alision

ENG4960 · ENG110 · ENG120 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Only take if ; expect and uneven organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear ExpectationsUnorganizedNice But Weak TeachingVague EssaysMissed Classes
  • Students often call her nice but and due dates.
  • Class can feel boring or scatterbrained, with missed meetings and weak structure.
  • Some still pass with solid work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Doing the essays and , but vague expectations raise the real effort cost.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard English writing work with essays and but not trivial either.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

At , and missing class is treated as a real issue.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

and discussion, others call her a horrible teacher.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Students who complete essays carefully report As and Bs; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

62/100

Main load is a few major essays, reading, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

She can be passionate and helpful, but many report vague directions, boredom, and weak structure.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and class discussion rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English sections mix passion and , and uneven clarity.

Main concern

and weak organization make it hard to know what she wants.

What students said

“Really hard to understands what she wants in her assignments!”
ENG120
“She does not remember when homeworks are due and .”
ENG120
“I really enjoyed her class and felt like she really tried to engage the class in discussions.”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and discussion more than formal exams, with .

Essay HeavyClass DiscussionSyllabus Drift

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment is mainly essays and participation; .

Essay AssignmentsClass DiscussionVague Instructions
“There aren't too many assignments in the class exept for some essays and reading of course”
ENG120
“3 major papers. just happy to be done with english.”
ENG120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good person, but horrible teacher”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews (2008-2015), highlighting clarity, organization, and niceness themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

😕 Clarity Problems

48/100

“Really hard to understands what she wants in her assignments!”

📋 Organization Gaps

40/100

“She does not remember when homeworks are due and .”

💬 Engaging When On

70/100

“I really enjoyed her class and felt like she really tried to engage the class in discussions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Class periods were relatively boring and she never made anyone participate.
  • A lot of unnecessary talk in the class, not much about what we really need to know.
  • , and her class isn't too difficult if you do all the work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I went to every class and As and Bs and ended up getting an A in the class.
  • Her class is not that hard, if you pay attention, ask questions, participate, and do the work you are fine.
  • Disaster! Really hard to understands what she wants in her assignments!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • At first I really like .
  • She's nice and shes helpful.
  • Nice, but a bit scatterbrained.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine in-person reviews span 2008-2015 with mixed detail; opinions are somewhat consistent on niceness vs clarity issues, but all are older.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1207 reviews
ENG1101 review
ENG49601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values