AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Beverly Wight

COUN · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Worth trying for detailed transfer or counseling help, but rapport can vary sharply by student.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAbove and Beyond CounselorHonest and RealisticPolarizing ServiceDetail OrientedMixed Rapport
  • Two students call her one of the best Grossmont counselors who listens and goes above and beyond.
  • She is praised as honest, knowledgeable, and willing to give hard truths.
  • One strong negative review alleges rude, slow paperwork and blame-shifting.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Counseling-focused reviews do not map cleanly to grade easiness; difficulty ratings conflict.

All evidence is from in-person counseling reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Counseling meetings are not described as academically brutal by the positive majority.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

counseling reviews.

In-person counseling context only; no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Two strong recommends for helpful honest counseling outweigh one harsh avoid review.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Not a traditional graded lecture course; service .

Format shift

Based only on in-person counseling reviews.

Workload

Light

75/100

Reviews focus on meetings and paperwork rather than heavy coursework.

Format shift

Based only on in-person counseling reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Majority praise deep knowledge and above-and-beyond help; one student reports the opposite.

Format shift

Based only on in-person counseling reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Feedback centers on counseling guidance and paperwork, not exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person counseling reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

two glowing reviews versus one that .

Main concern

Service quality may depend on the interaction; paperwork delays are a reported risk.

What students said

“She is the best counselor. I have met with a few counselors at Grossmont, she stands out from the rest.”
COUN
“One of the best counselors at Grossmont. She is honest and will not sugarcoat reality.”
COUN
“Condescending, rude, and unhelpful. Does not process paperwork in a timely manner”
COUN

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams; this is counseling-focused feedback.

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person counseling reviews do .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I LOVE Ms. Wight. She is the best counselor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person counseling reviews, highlighting . Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Counseling Quality

68/100

“She always answers the questions I have, she listens, and she is willing to go above and beyond to help with whatever is needed.”

💬 Honesty

75/100

“She is honest and will not sugarcoat reality.”

⚠️ Service Risk

25/100

“Condescending, rude, and unhelpful. Does not process paperwork in a timely manner, and will blame you for her errors”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • She is realistic and provides detailed information
  • extremely knowledgeable and goes above and beyond
  • stands out from the rest

Theme 2

⚠️ Negative Experience

  • Condescending, rude, and unhelpful
  • will blame you for her errors and lack of foresight
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed but polarized in-person reviews from 2014-2015; small sample with no grade distribution.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COUN3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values