AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cheryl Vallejo

MATH121 · MATH35 · MATH160 · MATH178 · MATH103 · MATH90 · MATH120 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Only take her if you can self-teach from the book and want a fair grader who offers , not if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing Math TeacherSide-Tracked LecturesExtra Credit HelperBook-Example HeavyMixed Clarity
  • Student and rude unclear lecturer.
  • , and group work help grades for those who keep up.
  • Expect ; self-study often required.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

, and group tests help grades, but and exam prep.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Lower-level math can feel manageable, yet some students rate difficulty high and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as important while and she often arrives late.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Strong praise and , so fit depends on how much help you need.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Students note , and group testing that softens grade pressure.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and a final, which is standard rather than light.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

About half the class finds her clear and helpful; others report rudeness, mistakes, and circular answers.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments center , and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some students call her fair and confuses basic questions.

Main concern

Clarity and respect vary a lot by section; weak students may feel dismissed.

What students said

“One of the . A very fair person and was always there to help.”
MATH121
“Find a better math teacher. , but she likes to ignore questions she feels are too dumb.”
MATH120
“If you need a lot of explaining from a teacher, this is not the class (basically self taught).”
MATH90

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect several in-class style tests plus a and occasional group tests.

Multiple TestsFinal ExamHomework Before TestsGroup Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , and sometimes group tests with dropped low scores.

Multiple TestsFinal ExamHomework Before TestsGroup TestsDrop Lowest Test
“HW due before tests, 4 tests, 1 final.”
MATH120
“She offers , drops 1 of the .”
MATH160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the . A very fair person and was always there to help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews spanning 2010-2015, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She seems to like the subject well enough, but when it comes to teaching it, it is not her forte.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Softeners

68/100

“Gives lots of .”

📚

42/100

“If you need a lot of explaining from a teacher, this is not the class (basically self taught).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I think she , and helpful.
  • She gets side tracked a lot.
  • Teaches straight from the examples in the book.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Gives lots of .
  • She offers , drops 1 of the .
  • Was able to answer all my questions and was easy to get in touch with.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Frustrations

  • she likes to ignore questions she feels are too dumb.
  • terrible Teacher. she makes so many mistakes.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed but older in-person reviews show consistent polarization, lowering confidence despite usable detail.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1204 reviews
MATH352 reviews
MATH1031 review
MATH1211 review
MATH1601 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH1781 review
MATH901 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values