AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

B. Loveless

ESL7434 · ESL110 · ESL119 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

; students uniformly call the experience a mistake.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear ExplanationsNative-Level ExpectationsTough ESL GradingNo Second ChancesStrong Avoid
  • All five reviews are extremely negative on clarity and fairness for ESL writers.
  • Students say she assumes native-level writing skill and will not scaffold second-language learners.
  • Grades and difficulty ratings align with a harsh, unhelpful experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Students report , and native-level writing expectations that .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Material is not explained clearly and is treated as if students already write at native academic level.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every review rejects her, often in and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students report no chances and native-genius writing standards that produce low grades.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Comments stress clarity and toughness more than volume of assignments, with writing standards as the main burden.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Across reviews she is called the clearly.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Focus is writing performance and class standards rather than a .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

unclear explanations, native-writer expectations, and .

Main concern

Fails to teach ESL students at an appropriate second-language level.

What students said

“she is the . .”
ESL119
“ . She thinks everyone is able to write as a native writer.”
ESL119
“she is absloutly the most tough teacher I have ever had!!!. She don't give any chanses”
ESL110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not detail proctoring or exam format; the composition.

Writing-Centered AssessmentNative-Level Expectations

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students emphasize tough writing expectations and policy.

Writing-Centered AssessmentNative-Level Expectations
“she thinks everyone has a degree in writing like her”
ESL119
“She don't give any chanses she believes every one is a geniuss in writing!!!”
ESL110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting unclear ESL instruction and harsh standards. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“ . It was a big mistake when I took this class with her.”

⚖️

12/100

“She don't give any chanses she believes every one is a geniuss in writing!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She should not teach ESL classes
  • she is not good teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the most tough teacher I have ever had
  • She don't give any chanses
  • she thinks everyone is able to write as a native writer

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistently negative reviews across years form a , though sample size and detail depth remain limited.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ESL1193 reviews
ESL1101 review
ESL74341 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values