AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Madeline Noakes

CD125 · CHILD125 · CD127 · CHILDDEVELOPME · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will attend and do the work; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear expectationsUseful for future teachersPickypaper grading onlineAttendance points matterMixed online vs in-person
  • , and practical for future teachers.
  • Online CD125 and picky deductions.
  • Workload and supply costs can be real, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and fair, but others say not an easy A and note picky deductions and trick opinion questions.

The single online review says not an easy A; in-person .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Many find content manageable and useful, while a few report fast talk, heavy chapter study, and challenging quizzes.

Difficulty comments come mostly from in-person CD125 and CD127 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Students report and advice to show up every time.

; the online review did not clarify attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and practical teacher-prep work despite workload and some online friction.

Recommendation is stronger for in-person CD127 than for online-style CD125 experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Described as clear and fair overall, but some report tiny deductions and trick opinion questions.

Format shift

Picky deduction complaints cluster around CD125 online-style work.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and presentation supplies add real time and money cost.

Format shift

Workload comments are almost all in-person CD127.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and useful, with a minority finding her self-focused or fast-talking.

Format shift

Stronger praise is in-person; and more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of , and major projects like lesson-plan notebooks.

Format shift

Online review emphasizes assignments; and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and usefulness, especially CD127, with some complaints about picky online-style work, self-talk, and heavy supply or .

Main concern

Lots of work, money for supplies, and .

What students said

“ and prepared. This class is a lot of work and it takes money to buy all the stuff you need for presentations but it is an okay class.”
CD127
“Great teacher! Lots of homework but useful for your own classrooms if you are soon-to-be teacher.”
CD127
“Dont take online. Each DB was a research paper instead of a discussion and the thing.”
CD125

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One and quick responses, but it is not an easy A.

Main concern

You still need consistent work; fair grading does not mean .

What students said

“As long as you keep up with the assignments, this is an great course. and she provides examples to .”
CD125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard and sometimes tricky or opinion-based rather than .

Quizzes and testsOpinion-style questionsLecture-aligned tests

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, plus some trick or opinion questions on quizzes and tests.

Lecture-based testsTrick opinion questions
“Also the in the classroom.”
CHILDDEVELOPME
“Trick questions on the test. They were opinion questions not straight facts.”
CD125

Online

The one online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very clear, organized and prepared. This class is a lot of work and it takes money to buy all the stuff you need for presentations but it is an okay class. so if you . I recomend her”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, workload, and online friction. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

78/100

“ and fair. . show up EVERYTIME! can be fun!”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“Great teacher! Lots of homework but useful for your own classrooms if you are soon-to-be teacher.”

💻 Online Friction

45/100

“I felt punished for taking the online class. Each discussion board was a mini paper and assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes the class easy and fun.
  • and prepared.
  • Great class, good information and lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • don't think this is an easy "A". Fair and .
  • in the classroom.
  • assignments.

Theme 3

📝

  • Lots of homework but useful for your own classrooms
  • show up EVERYTIME! can be fun!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews span many years with consistent themes, but most are old, sparse on grades, and only one is clearly online.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD1276 reviews
CD1253 reviews
CHILD1251 review
CHILDDEVELOPME1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values