AI Rate Professor

Languages

Irene Jones

JAP120 · JPN120 · JAP1 · JAPANESEI · JPN1 · JAPANSECT · JAPANESE1 · JAPN120 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you only need an easy A and can fully teach yourself Japanese.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes Not TeachHearing IssuesEasy ASelf-Study OnlyAvoid If Learning Matters
  • Most students say she does not teach and communication is blocked by hearing and language issues.
  • Many call it an easy A if , but you often leave without real Japanese skill.
  • Overwhelming majority urge avoiding her unless you are desperate or already know the language.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many reviews explicitly call it an easy A even while slamming the teaching.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is intro Japanese and , but poor teaching makes real learning hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; some note students stop showing up with .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Dominant if you actually want to learn Japanese.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Repeated easy-A comments and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

, and self-paced textbook work dominate.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students repeatedly say she does not teach, cannot hear, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of tests, skits, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but instruction, hearing, and clarity are widely slammed; self-motivated students may pass without learning much.

Main concern

You may get an easy grade but not learn the language, and help is hard to get.

What students said

“Doesn't teach AT ALL, only gives you material.”
JPN120
“Easy A but you won't understand the language at all.”
JAPN120
“ . She is plain USELESS.”
JAP120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some tests and a skit are mentioned, but .

Tests MentionedSkitSelf-Study Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a skit; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

TestsSkitHard Tests For Some
“little homework (she doesnnt check it), 4 tests, and skit.”
JPN120
“the ”
JAPN120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , unless its last resort/desperation.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 in-person reviews, highlighting non-teaching, easy grades, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Doesn't teach AT ALL, only gives you material. Worse teacher I've had.”

🅰️ Easy Grade Path

82/100

“Easy A, frustrating/horrible 4 months.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ . She is plain USELESS.”

👂 Communication Barrier

20/100

“Has hearing problems, you can yell and she won't hear(not exaggerating).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't teach AT ALL, only gives you material.
  • She often uses you don't listen as a reason why your scores might be lacking
  • only gives you a textbook assignment and expects you to know what the hell it says

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A but you won't understand the language at all.
  • This was an extremely easy class.
  • if you try hard, you can have an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • But, she is sweet.
  • She is a good person. She just shouldn't teach.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

29 detailed in-person reviews spanning 2004-2012 with highly consistent criticism of teaching quality.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 518

Course coverage

JAPN12011 reviews
JPN1209 reviews
JAP1204 reviews
JAP11 review
JAPANESE11 review
Show 3 more courses
JAPANESEI1 review
JAPANSECT1 review
JPN11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values