AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michael Linens

MATH175 · MATH176 · MATH160 · MATH90 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear ExplanationsSkips StepsBoring DeliveryHomework After QuizzesNot Recommended
  • , and poor exam preparation.
  • One student liked him, but the majority report confusion and weak support.
  • Small sample makes confidence limited, yet the tone is consistently negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even students who attend and tutor report poor grades because quizzes and concepts are not clearly prepared in class.

; no online reviews were available.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material feels harder than it should because steps are skipped and .

; no online reviews were available.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; one student came every day and still struggled.

; no online reviews were available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Three of four reviews strongly discourage and poor outcomes.

; no online reviews were available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Limited grade data, but one student got a and tutoring.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload details are sparse; struggle centers more .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Reviews emphasize boring delivery, skipped steps, and explanations that confuse the class.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Homework and explained only after assessments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math reviews mostly report boring lectures, skipped steps, and weak alignment between class and quizzes.

Main concern

Students say he reviews old homework instead of preparing them for current quizzes and concepts.

What students said

“He doesn't even explain what's on the !”
MATH160
“Mr. Lines was not a helpful teacher. .”
MATH176
“His voice sounds very boring makes you want to fall asleep.”
MATH90

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not prove proctoring tools, but students say .

Quizzes After MaterialPoor Exam PrepHomework Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework appear poorly aligned with what is taught during class time.

QuizzesHomework Review Focus
“He doesn't even explain what's on the !”
MATH160
“He just stands at the front of the room .”
MATH160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Worst Teacher. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting unclear teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Mr. Lines was not a helpful teacher. .”

📉 Recommendation

22/100

“I would not reccomend taking Mr. Lines.”

😴 Lecture Style

30/100

“His voice sounds very boring makes you want to fall asleep.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he skipped many steps that he taught was common sense to him
  • .
  • HE IS GOOD TEACHER I LIKE HIM

Theme 2

📈 About Outcomes

  • I sat in the front, came everyday, went to tutoring, and still got a D-
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only four short in-person reviews exist, with limited grade detail and no recent volume.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1601 review
MATH1751 review
MATH1761 review
MATH901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values