AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Dianne Helland

NUR120 · NURS130 · NUR231 · NURS132 · NURSE132 · NURS120 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if and handle uneven structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedInconsistent gradingSelf-teach heavyPicky paperworkMixed nursing support
  • and .
  • and fairness are repeatedly questioned.
  • A few , but negatives dominate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and perfectionist paperwork make high grades feel effortful and uncertain.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty is raised by disorganization and self-teaching demands more than by content alone.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

sample.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Dominant student tone says she is disorganized, unhelpful, or a poor instructor fit.

Negative recommendation tone .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report inconsistent grades and heavy red marks for paperwork perfection.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is less about volume and more about rework, delays, and exacting paper standards.

Format shift

Workload picture comes from in-person nursing comments only.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Frequent disorganization and .

Format shift

Teaching critique dominates the six in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Paperwork, skills checkoffs, and .

Format shift

Assessment comments are from in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person nursing reviews mostly criticize disorganization, uneven help, and .

Main concern

Students often say they had to reteach material themselves and saw uneven treatment.

What students said

“ and scatter-brained!”
NURS132
“ ! I had to basically class by going over everything again.”
NURS130
“ project”
NURS120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One review says pediatrics tests are easy, but .

Easy tests in pediatricsSkills check offsPaperwork heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and skills checkoffs but do not prove proctoring policy.

Easy tests in pediatricsSkills check offsPaperwork heavy
“ , and and cares about her students!”
NUR231
“When it comes to skills check off, she prepares her own style than doing it the right way!”
NUR120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and scatter-brained!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting disorganization, fairness concerns, and mixed subject strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Organization

30/100

“ and scatter-brained!”

⚖️

28/100

“ project”

📚 Self Teaching Burden

32/100

“I had to basically class by going over everything again.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and scatter-brained!
  • !!!
  • she is a bit lofty and disorganized.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • project
  • she expects perfection in papar work and will mark red marks every where
  • , and and cares about her students!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness Concerns

  • she does seem to pick on the men in the class
  • she seems to pick on men; tries to run them out of the program.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed in-person reviews span several years with consistent disorganization themes, though all are older.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NUR1201 review
NUR2311 review
NURS1201 review
NURS1301 review
NURS1321 review
Show 1 more courses
NURSE1321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values