AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Jerrica Mesquita

ENG106 · ESL96 · ESL106 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Good for motivated ESL students who want support, less ideal if you need easy writing scores.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEncouraging ESL mentorEssay rewritesStrict on effortMixed grading toneGrammar focused
  • , and lasting-help for ESL students.
  • and can be strict about laziness.
  • and class can feel boring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Rewrites and kindness help, but several students say she is strict and hard on writing scores.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

ESL content is manageable with effort, yet grammar and writing still demand real work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Highly recommended by motivated ESL students, strongly and boredom.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Essay rewrites and kind tone help some, while others feel scores are broken down too hard.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Essays, rewrites, and grammar practice create a moderate ESL workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

62/100

Many call her encouraging and clear, but a sizable minority finds her boring or ineffective.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Essays, rewrites, and writing scores drive the class more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ESL and complaints about boring lectures or harsh writing grades.

Main concern

Writing grades and classroom engagement feel uneven across students.

What students said

“I studied hard because Jerrica was such a encouraging teacher who motivated her students.”
ENG106
“She if you not satisfied with ur grade.”
ESL106
“the . if you want to learn ENGLISH.”
ESL106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays and .

Essay rewritesWriting-focused gradingGrammar practice

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mixed strictness on writing scores.

Essay rewritesWriting gradesNo clear proctoring details
“She if you not satisfied with ur grade.”
ESL106
“she all ways try to break our scores”
ESL106
“Especially, she gives sux degree at writing.”
ESL106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ESL students need a teacher like her. She even made learning grammar a good experience.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person ESL reviews with a . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“She was a extremely helpful,and encouraging teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“HIGHLY RECOMENDED”

⚖️

52/100

“She if you not satisfied with ur grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she pronunce everything slowy and clear
  • encouraging teacher who motivated her students
  • i feel bored with her class sometimes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she gives good grade for students
  • she all ways try to break our scores
  • gives sux degree at writing

Theme 3

❤️ About Mentorship

  • I still keep in touch with her
  • Whenever I need recommendation to pick a class I still contact her for help
  • She was strict, and that is one thing that shows a teacher is worried about the learning of its students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews show a and decent detail, but the sample is small and from 2009-2011.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL1064 reviews
ENG1061 review
ESL961 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values