AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Jorge Pena

FOREN220 · AOJ220 · AOJ000 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can learn almost entirely from the textbook and handouts on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandReads From HandoutsNot AccessibleArrogant ToneLow Class Grades
  • All three reviews rate teaching quality poorly despite one calling him a .
  • Students say he , and is .
  • Class grades reportedly cluster at low C or lower for some sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students report low C grades for many classmates and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

and graduate-level delivery make learning harder than it should be.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; comments focus on no breaks and poor accessibility.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Every review is negative on teaching, with students saying he should not teach college.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Reports of low class grades and and outcomes feel harsh.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, but textbooks and handouts drive the class with no breaks noted.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say he is hard to understand, reads handouts, lacks personality, and is not helpful.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews ; textbook and handouts dominate.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person AOJ and forensics classes where students say he , and lectures poorly.

Main concern

Poor communication and inaccessible help leave students stuck.

What students said

“teaching though, he is hard to understand.”
FOREN220
“Arrogant,not accessible,never E-mails you back,reads verbative from handouts”
AOJ000
“practically everyone in class is getting a low C or lower”
AOJ220

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

poor outcomes.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Some people though just arn't ment to be teachers!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting accessibility and lecture quality failures. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Poor Teaching Delivery

18/100

“reads verbative from handouts,is not helpful,does not give you breaks,has no personality”

🚫

12/100

“horrible professor. He should be teaching 5th graders.”

📉 Grade Reality

28/100

“practically everyone in class is getting a low C or lower”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is hard to understand
  • reads verbative from handouts
  • lectures as if to a four year or graduate school student

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He is the type of person who would be a great resource... teaching though
  • Very arrogant very taunting

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Three consistently negative in-person reviews across years agree on accessibility and teaching issues, but the sample is small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

AOJ0001 review
AOJ2201 review
FOREN2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values