AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Maria Tavakoli

CULTANTH120 · ANTH130 · ANTHROP120130 · ANTHROPOLOGY · ANTHRO110 · ANTHRO130 · ANTH170 · ANTH120 · ANTHR130 · ANTHR120 · ANTH102 · ANTHRO120 · ANTH140 · CULT120 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want to actually learn anthropology and will read and show up every day; skip if you want a light GE.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate anthropologistMust read the bookMandatory attendanceHilarious and eccentricHigh standards
  • Highly entertaining lectures that convert students into anthro majors.
  • read every chapter, attend always, and expect .
  • and study guides help, but this is not an easy A.
  • ],
  • suitableStudentTypeACCT-000018
  • overallSuggestion
  • if you want to actually learn anthropology and will read and show up every day; skip if you want a light GE.
  • courseFormats
  • :
  • online
  • :
  • :
  • reviewCount
  • :0
  • summary
  • :
  • suitableStudentType
  • :
  • mainConcern
  • :
  • confidence
  • :
  • Low
  • evidenceQuotes
  • :[]
  • inPerson
  • :
  • :
  • reviewCount
  • :27
  • summary
  • :
  • In-person anthro classes are lively, story-rich, and demanding; book reading and .
  • suitableStudentType
  • :
  • Hardcore Learner
  • mainConcern
  • :
  • and dense book exams punish casual students.
  • confidence
  • :
  • High
  • evidenceQuotes
  • :
  • [{
  • course
  • :
  • ANTHR130
  • quote
  • :
  • If you want an , but if you actually
  • },{
  • course
  • :
  • ANTH102
  • quote
  • :
  • .
  • },{
  • course
  • :
  • ANTH140
  • quote
  • :
  • You MUST READ the book to pass the lectures.
  • }]
  • }
  • }
  • keyQuestions
  • :
  • :
  • isEasyA
  • :
  • :
  • answerText
  • :
  • HardWork
  • score
  • :38
  • justification
  • :
  • helps, but dense reading and light effort.
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • easyCourse
  • :
  • :
  • answerText
  • :
  • Challenging
  • score
  • :32
  • justification
  • :
  • Students repeatedly call the material hard, information-heavy, and above casual GE expectations.
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • flexibleAttendance
  • :
  • :
  • answerText
  • :
  • Mandatory
  • score
  • :18
  • justification
  • :
  • and shifting test dates.
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • isRecommended
  • :
  • :
  • answerText
  • :
  • WorthIt
  • score
  • :80
  • justification
  • :
  • Most students love her passion and humor and if you will work; a .
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • }
  • courseGuide
  • :
  • :
  • lenientGrading
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • Fair
  • score
  • :55
  • details
  • :
  • Standards are high, yet study guides and give a fair path if you do the reading.
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • lightWorkload
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • Heavy
  • score
  • :38
  • details
  • :
  • , and occasional book reports create a demanding load.
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • teachingExperience
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • Excellent
  • score
  • :84
  • details
  • :
  • Eccentric, hilarious, and passion-driven lectures dominate praise with only limited clarity complaints.
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • assessmentMethod
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • FocusOnExams
  • score
  • :68
  • details
  • :
  • and visual lecture portions dominate; .
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • examStyle
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • Standard
  • score
  • :52
  • keyFeatures
  • :
  • [
  • Book-based exams
  • Visual lecture portion
  • Study guides
  • ]
  • details
  • :
  • and lecture visuals; one review notes a .
  • online
  • :
  • :
  • details
  • :
  • keyFeatures
  • :[]
  • evidenceQuotes
  • :[]
  • }
  • inPerson
  • :
  • :
  • details
  • :
  • from lectures; attendance matters.
  • keyFeatures
  • :
  • [
  • Book-based exams
  • Visual lecture portion
  • Study guides
  • ]
  • evidenceQuotes
  • :
  • [{
  • course
  • :
  • ANTH102
  • quote
  • :
  • , and visual.
  • },{
  • course
  • :
  • ANTHRO110
  • quote
  • :
  • We had a and two assignments that came at just the right time!
  • }]
  • }
  • }
  • }
  • credibility
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • Medium
  • score
  • :70
  • analysis
  • :
  • Twenty-seven mostly consistent in-person reviews from 2005-2010 give solid patterns but are dated.
  • }
  • studentVoices
  • :
  • :
  • topStudentVoice
  • :
  • I love her! She's DEF. one of and ! Yes, she expects A LOT, and is a very hard teacher but she just makes everything so interesting.
  • reviewCount
  • :27
  • aiAnalysisAndProofs
  • :
  • [{
  • title
  • :
  • 🎯 Teaching Quality
  • score
  • :84
  • studentVoice
  • :
  • She is THE most eccentric & hilarious gal I've ever taken classes with.
  • },{
  • title
  • :
  • 📚 Book Is Required
  • score
  • :35
  • studentVoice
  • :
  • AND U HAVE TO READ THE BOOK!!
  • },{
  • title
  • :
  • 📍
  • score
  • :18
  • studentVoice
  • :
  • .
  • },{
  • title
  • :
  • 👍 Recommendation
  • score
  • :80
  • studentVoice
  • :
  • Take this class and don't miss out on a really great professor!
  • }]
  • studentHighlightsByTheme
  • :
  • [{
  • themeTitle
  • :
  • 👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style
  • highlights
  • :
  • [
  • She's very passionate about her work!
  • her lectures make the class interesting
  • She is funny, interesting, and a great teacher.
  • ]
  • },{
  • themeTitle
  • :
  • 📈 About Difficulty & Grades
  • highlights
  • :
  • [
  • If you want an
  • You MUST READ the book to pass the tests
  • Class is very hard though, since her standards are a lot higher
  • ]
  • },{
  • themeTitle
  • :
  • ❤️ About Character
  • highlights
  • :
  • [
  • She is amazing!!!
  • Shes funny n isnt afriad to talk about beer and sex!
  • she's scary intimidating.
  • ]
  • }]
  • analysisMethodology
  • :
  • Voice snapshots generated from 27 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2010, highlighting passion, difficulty, and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.
  • }
  • }
  • :
  • :
  • teacherName
  • :
  • Slobodan Blazic
  • totalRating
  • :28
  • professorTags
  • :
  • [
  • Not beginner-friendly
  • Mixed reviews
  • ]
  • summary
  • :
  • :
  • keyPoints
  • :
  • [
  • Geography lab is widely called harder than a 1-unit class should be.
  • Several students say .
  • A minority still earn As with heavy effort.
  • ]
  • suitableStudentType
  • :
  • Hardcore Learner
  • overallSuggestion
  • :
  • Avoid unless you and will grind; most reviewers found teaching and .
  • }
  • courseFormats
  • :
  • :
  • online
  • :
  • :
  • reviewCount
  • :0
  • summary
  • :
  • suitableStudentType
  • :
  • mainConcern
  • :
  • confidence
  • :
  • Low
  • evidenceQuotes
  • :[]
  • }
  • inPerson
  • :
  • :
  • reviewCount
  • :6
  • summary
  • :
  • and poorly explained for many; a few diligent students still succeed.
  • suitableStudentType
  • :
  • Hardcore Learner
  • mainConcern
  • :
  • and .
  • confidence
  • :
  • Medium
  • evidenceQuotes
  • :
  • [{
  • course
  • :
  • GEO121
  • quote
  • :
  • Smart guy, but not a good teacher. and frustrating.
  • },{
  • course
  • :
  • GEO121
  • quote
  • :
  • Way too hard for a 1 unit class.
  • },{
  • course
  • :
  • LAB121
  • quote
  • :
  • Class is not easy but professor is good. I got an A.
  • }]
  • }
  • }
  • keyQuestions
  • :
  • :
  • isEasyA
  • :
  • :
  • answerText
  • :
  • HardWork
  • score
  • :32
  • justification
  • :
  • An A is possible with heavy effort, but labs and picky scoring make easy grades unlikely.
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • easyCourse
  • :
  • :
  • answerText
  • :
  • Challenging
  • score
  • :28
  • justification
  • :
  • Students describe labs as very hard and heavier than other geography courses.
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • flexibleAttendance
  • :
  • :
  • answerText
  • :
  • Varies
  • score
  • :50
  • justification
  • :
  • available reviews.
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • isRecommended
  • :
  • :
  • answerText
  • :
  • Avoid
  • score
  • :30
  • justification
  • :
  • More students warn not to take him due to confusion and .
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • }
  • courseGuide
  • :
  • :
  • lenientGrading
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • Strict
  • score
  • :32
  • details
  • :
  • Complaints about near-full marks withheld (29.9 of 30) and .
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • lightWorkload
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • Heavy
  • score
  • :28
  • details
  • :
  • Multiple reviews say the 1-unit lab outworks 3-unit geography courses.
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • teachingExperience
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • Poor
  • score
  • :35
  • details
  • :
  • Students often call explanations unclear and say .
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • assessmentMethod
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • FocusOnAssignments
  • score
  • :35
  • details
  • :
  • Comments center on hard labs and .
  • formatNote
  • :
  • ; no online reviews.
  • }
  • examStyle
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • Standard
  • score
  • :45
  • keyFeatures
  • :
  • [
  • Picky lab scoring
  • ]
  • details
  • :
  • Reviews focus on difficult lab assignments and .
  • online
  • :
  • :
  • details
  • :
  • keyFeatures
  • :[]
  • evidenceQuotes
  • :[]
  • }
  • inPerson
  • :
  • :
  • details
  • :
  • ; exam policies are not clearly described.
  • keyFeatures
  • :
  • [
  • Picky lab scoring
  • ]
  • evidenceQuotes
  • :
  • [{
  • course
  • :
  • GEO121
  • quote
  • :
  • Labs very hard and frustrating.
  • },{
  • course
  • :
  • GEO121
  • quote
  • :
  • Seemed to enjoy giving grades of 29.9 out of 30, he did it so often.
  • }]
  • }
  • }
  • }
  • credibility
  • :
  • :
  • level
  • :
  • Low
  • score
  • :40
  • analysis
  • :
  • Only six short mixed reviews from 2009-2010 limit confidence despite a .
  • }
  • studentVoices
  • :
  • :
  • topStudentVoice
  • :
  • Smart guy, but not a good teacher. and frustrating. Doesn't know english super well. .
  • reviewCount
  • :6
  • aiAnalysisAndProofs
  • :
  • [{
  • title
  • :
  • 🎯 Teaching Quality
  • score
  • :35
  • studentVoice
  • :
  • Does not have a gift for teaching. .
  • },{
  • title
  • :
  • 💪
  • score
  • :28
  • studentVoice
  • :
  • Way too hard for a 1 unit class.
  • },{
  • title
  • :
  • 👎 Recommendation
  • score
  • :30
  • studentVoice
  • :
  • I do not recomend him.
  • }]
  • studentHighlightsByTheme
  • :
  • [{
  • themeTitle
  • :
  • 👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style
  • highlights
  • :
  • [
  • Smart guy, but not a good teacher.
  • .
  • professor is good. I got an A.
  • ]
  • },{
  • themeTitle
  • :
  • 📈 About Difficulty & Grades
  • highlights
  • :
  • [
  • Labs very hard and frustrating.
  • Way too hard for a 1 unit class.
  • If .
  • ]
  • }]
  • analysisMethodology
  • :
  • Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews from 2009-2010. Credibility rating: Low.
  • }
  • }
  • ]}

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

helps, but dense reading and light effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students repeatedly call the material hard, information-heavy, and above casual GE expectations.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and shifting test dates.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students love her passion and humor and if you will work; a .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Standards are high, yet study guides and give a fair path if you do the reading.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Heavy textbook reading, detailed tests, and occasional book reports create a demanding load.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

84/100

Eccentric, hilarious, and passion-driven lectures dominate praise with only limited clarity complaints.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

and visual lecture portions dominate; .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person anthro classes are lively, story-rich, and demanding; book reading and .

Main concern

and dense book exams punish casual students.

What students said

“If you want an , but if you actually ”
ANTHR130
“ .”
ANTH102
“You MUST READ the book to pass the lectures.”
ANTH140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams usually split book content and lecture visuals; one review notes a .

Book-based examsVisual lecture portionStudy guidesExtra creditTake-home midterm (mentioned once)

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

material from lectures; attendance matters.

Book-based examsVisual lecture portionStudy guidesTake-home midterm
“ , and visual.”
ANTH102
“We had a and two assignments that came at just the right time!”
ANTHRO110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I love her! She's DEF. one of and ! Yes, she expects A LOT, and is a very hard teacher but she just makes everything so interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2010, highlighting passion, difficulty, and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She is THE most eccentric & hilarious gal I've ever taken classes with.”

📚 Book Is Required

35/100

“AND U HAVE TO READ THE BOOK!!”

📍

18/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“Take this class and don't miss out on a really great professor!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's very passionate about her work!
  • her lectures make the class interesting
  • She is funny, interesting, and a great teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want an
  • You MUST READ the book to pass the tests
  • Class is very hard though, since her standards are a lot higher

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is amazing!!!
  • Shes funny n isnt afriad to talk about beer and sex!
  • she's scary intimidating.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven mostly consistent in-person reviews from 2005-2010 give solid patterns but are dated.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 58
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH1205 reviews
ANTH1405 reviews
ANTHROPOLOGY3 reviews
ANTH1302 reviews
ANTHRO1202 reviews
Show 9 more courses
CULT1202 reviews
ANTH1021 review
ANTH1701 review
ANTHR1201 review
ANTHR1301 review
ANTHRO1101 review
ANTHRO1301 review
ANTHROP1201301 review
CULTANTH1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values