AI Rate Professor

History

David Reeves

HIST105 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

and say missing one syllabus quiz can sink you.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesHarsh Quiz TrapsHeavy Online ReadingHard to FollowAvoid If Possible
  • Students describe lectures as scattered and
  • Heavy poorly written
  • and high difficulty

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

High difficulty ratings and most students.

All ; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Scattered lectures plus dense online reading create a .

All ; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; the bigger issue is keeping up with syllabus quizzes and readings.

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The detailed and rates teaching as terrible.

All ; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Missing a syllabus quiz is described as catastrophic, signaling unforgiving assessment.

Format shift

Based entirely on in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of online reading that students say is poorly written adds significant weekly burden.

Format shift

Based entirely on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say he cannot follow his own train of thought and is extremely hard to learn from.

Format shift

Based entirely on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Syllabus quizzes and .

Format shift

Based entirely on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person HIST105 is described as chaotic and punitive quizzes.

Main concern

and easy-to-miss quizzes make the course high-risk.

What students said

“This teacher is terrible! He most likely has ADD. He can't follow his own train of thought, let alone a student trying to follow along.”
HIST105
“There is a lot of reading online. Most of it is not real English. And if you overlook a .”
HIST105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes hidden in the syllabus and .

Syllabus QuizzesHeavy Online ReadingPunitive Missed Quiz Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person HIST105 relies on online readings and .

Syllabus QuizzesHeavy Online Reading
“And if you overlook a . !!!!”
HIST105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher is terrible! He most likely has ADD. He can't follow his own train of thought, let alone a student trying to follow along. !!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, dominated by one detailed negative account. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“This teacher is terrible! He most likely has ADD. He can't follow his own train of thought, let alone a student trying to follow along.”

📚 Workload & Reading

28/100

“There is a lot of reading online. Most of it is not real English. Filled with words like didnst and thy and that sort of stuff.”

⚠️ Quiz Risk

20/100

“And if you overlook a . !!!!”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“ !!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He can't follow his own train of thought
  • This teacher is terrible

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you overlook a
  • There is a lot of reading online

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Risk

  • !!!!
  • Most of it is not real English

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 reviews, one without comments; very small sample and both from 2009 reduce reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST1052 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values