AI Rate Professor

History

Jonathan Martin

HISTORY · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a supportive History and no late penalties, but be ready for writing and occasional policy quirks.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat feedbackNo late penaltiesWriting-heavyPassionate and chillSkills-based grading
  • , and accessible teaching.
  • Online sections and .
  • A minority dislike modern-standards editorializing or strict AI/punctuation redo rules.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

, but weekly writing and skill proofs still require real work.

Online reviews stress writing load; and difficulty ratings are more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Most call the class fairly easy with readable material, though some online sections feel writing-heavy.

Online comments emphasize reading and weekly writing; in-person difficulty reports range from 1 to 5.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

Most reviews say attendance was not mandatory, with .

Online reviews generally treat attendance as non-issue; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and support, with a few strong dissenters.

Online reviews are mostly enthusiastic; in-person includes both glowing and highly critical takes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

No late penalties, , and supportive feedback outweigh the occasional strict rewrite policy.

Format shift

Online is generally forgiving; one online review describes harsh AI punctuation enforcement.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly reading and 300-word writing tasks are common, so the load is steady rather than light.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of reading and writing; in-person comments are less workload-specific.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students mostly call him clear, passionate, funny, and .

Format shift

; in-person is mostly positive with one content-style complaint.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on weekly writing, papers, and proving skills more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online evidence is assignment-heavy; one review tags test heavy but most comments focus on writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is often called chill and clear, but one student felt lectures over-judge the past by modern standards.

Main concern

Content can feel heavily editorialized if you want traditional fact-focused history.

What students said

“The professor is super chill and easy to talk to.”
History
“he is really good at doing it in a way I understand. Even better!! He is easy to talk to and gave no late penalties!!”
History
“I want to learn history, not watch someone try to judge ancient civilizations by 21st century standards.”
History

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online History is mostly easy-to-moderate, writing-focused, with , and no late penalties.

Main concern

One student reported harsh AI detection on punctuation and forced rewrites without Google Docs.

What students said

“This class was fairly easy, just a lot of reading and a few lecture videos every week.”
History
“i loved this class and does not give late penalties.”
History
“he makes you redo your work if you have too many periods or commas the AI will detect it”
History

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize weekly writing and skill proofs more than high-stakes proctored exams.

Writing assignmentsSkills-based gradingDetailed paper feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; feedback and are mentioned more than testing rules.

Extra creditGood feedback
“Honestly, I really enjoyed this class. The professor is super chill and easy to talk to.”
History

Online

Online work centers on weekly reading, short writing, lecture videos, and ; proctoring is not clearly proven.

Weekly writingLecture videosPaper feedbackAI detection on writing
“The that was around 300 words.”
History
“You earn skills rather than grades. You prove your learned skills to get your grade.”
History

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you wanna prof who will actually work with you and not just pretend you don't exist then this is the guy! And no late !”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (6 online, 3 in and content critiques. Credibility rating: High.

📝

90/100

“ and answers his emails within a day if you had any questions.”

⏳ No Late Penalties

88/100

“does not give late penalties. also has full lecture videos online which makes it feel like less of an online class.”

⚠️ Content Style Risk

40/100

“I want to learn history, not watch someone try to judge ancient civilizations by 21st century standards.”

✍️ Writing Load

55/100

“There was a lot of writing, but he really helps .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The professor is super chill and easy to talk to
  • You can tell he is very passionate about his subject
  • Prof. J is funny!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class was fairly easy, just a lot of reading
  • no late
  • You earn skills rather than grades

Theme 3

⚠️

  • judge ancient civilizations by 21st century standards
  • AI will detect it which he would make you redo it and you can't even use Google Docs

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine recent reviews across online and few clear outliers.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

History9 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values