AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Robert Hasson

MATH253 · MATH222 · MATH252 · MATH253270 · MATH270 · MATH268 · 94 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take him if you want serious math learning and can , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong lecturerFast-pacedTest heavyHarsh graderOffice-hour support
  • Many students call him an and answers questions.
  • The , and grades can hinge on small mistakes.
  • , and use office hours often do well, while weaker or less structured students may struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic for prepared , and study exams, but it is not a low-effort grade.

, while online evidence is more polarized and warns about lecture delivery.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math , and proof-heavy practice make the course intellectually demanding.

Both formats show challenging content, with online students more likely to mention pace and handwriting barriers.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but many reviews say missing lectures leaves students lost.

In-person reviews strongly stress attending class, while online reviews emphasize keeping up with lectures and office hours.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

He is recommended for motivated math students because his lectures and office hours are strong, but .

In-person recommendation is stronger overall, while online reviews and avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Many students report process mistakes.

Format shift

Strict grading is mainly documented in in-person reviews, with .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Homework, study guides, cumulative exams, and frequent practice create a .

Format shift

Both formats mention substantial homework and .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

He is often praised as , and helpful, but fast pacing and old-school delivery hurt some students.

Format shift

but polarized, while online reviews show more problems with lecture delivery.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are repeatedly described as based mostly on tests, cumulative exams, and a .

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly positive for strong, prepared students but warn , and .

Main concern

The main .

What students said

“ .”
MATH253
“He teaches fast and it's easy to get lost.”
MATH270
“He is the .”
MATH268

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and very difficult, with complaints about fast Zoom lectures and .

Main concern

Online students may struggle with lecture pace, handwriting, and .

What students said

“Pretty much everything on the .”
MATH270
“ .”
MATH252
“his lectures are very confusing due to his unreadable handwriting and break-neck pace.”
MATH252

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and central to the grade, but as fair if students study homework and reviews.

Frequent ExamsCumulative TestsLowest Test DroppedFinal ExamTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe frequent cumulative exams, a final, and proctoring rules.

Cumulative TestsFinal ExamStrict Exam GradingLowest Test Dropped
“The class is graded based on 5 tests (lowest score is dropped) and a .”
MATH268
“5 exams worth 70% of grade and 1 final worth 30% grade.”
MATH268
“6 exams per semester, all in person, labor extensive, unfair grading criteria, all for only 3 units.”
MATH270

Online

Online reviews describe five exams plus a final and a dropped lowest test, but .

Five ExamsFinal ExamLowest Test Dropped
“The course itself had 5 exams plus the final.”
MATH270
“5 tests, 1 is dropped if your hw grade is above 80%.”
MATH270

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You either hate this guy or love him. His lectures are very good but very fast.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Fantastic lecturer. Prof , and answer questions and problems.”

🧪

48/100

“5 exams worth 70% of grade and 1 final worth 30% grade.”

⚖️

35/100

“He is very strict on the grading and is not very lenient on you if mess up a little.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He has a way of making math very easy.
  • His lectures are fast, but I found them manageable to follow.
  • He teaches fast and it's easy to get lost.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams and Grading

  • Very test heavy - 65% exams, 25% final, 10% homework.
  • He grades extremely harshly on small mistakes.
  • , and .

Theme 3

📚 About Effort and Support

  • Doing all the homework and comes to doing well on exams.
  • He gives SO MUCH time to ask questions and .
  • Do the work, go to office hours, and do well on the tests!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

94

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

The credibility is high because 50 detailed reviews across formats show a consistent pattern of strong teaching paired with and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 558
4 out of 510
3 out of 55
2 out of 59
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH25214 reviews
MATH27014 reviews
MATH26813 reviews
MATH2537 reviews
MATH2221 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH2532701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 3 · A 22

B range

4

B 4

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4