AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kazumi Tsuchiyose

MATH200 · MATH252 · MATH241 · MATH120 · CALC252 · MATH251 · MATH270 · 92 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
46.67%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong at self-teaching math, can keep up with heavy work, and are comfortable with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderHeavy HomeworkFast PacedPolarizing TeachingTest Heavy
  • Students repeatedly , and hard tests across both online and in-person classes.
  • Teaching reviews are polarized, with some praising her care and clarity while .
  • Success appears possible for disciplined students, but GPA risk is high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Even when students pass, comments repeatedly , and major GPA risk.

Both online and , though a few online reviews mention or easier tests when students keep up.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content is fast-paced and conceptually demanding, with many students .

Online and in-person reviews both describe fast pacing, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and participation appear important, with , and falling behind after missing class.

In-person reviews give the , while online reviews mention participation and camera expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Many students warn against taking her because , and explanations often do not help enough.

, though both also include a minority of highly positive reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students frequently describe , and few forgiving grade paths.

Format shift

Online reviews mention strict exam deductions and oral tests, while .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and heavy study demands.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online summer courses often described as especially compressed.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students praise her care and clarity, but many describe confusing, rushed, passive-aggressive, or self-teaching-heavy classes.

Format shift

Online and slightly more negative about classroom interaction.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades appear heavily driven by tests, finals, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention tests heavily, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews also show a demanding and polarizing class, with frequent complaints , and harsh interactions.

Main concern

Students report fast pacing, mandatory participation, and .

What students said

“Definitely be ready to learn all of Calc 2 on your own if .”
MATH252
“ for 2 hours and 30 minutes.”
MATH251
“ and very hard test, 4 test and 1 final.”
MATH270

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly mixed, with some students praising clear support but , and difficult tests.

Main concern

Online , and confusing instruction.

What students said

“Do not register for her if .”
MATH251
“ORAL tests because she thought all of her online classes cheat.”
MATH270
“ if you study. not a lot of hw.”
MATH270

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students repeatedly , and test-heavy grading.

Strict GradingOral TestsTest HeavyHard TestsCheat Sheet Mentioned in One In-Person Review

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals, pop quizzes, and one cheat sheet allowance, so the overall in-person exam style is demanding.

Hard TestsPop QuizzesMultiple TestsCheat Sheet Mentioned
“ and very hard test, 4 test and 1 final.”
MATH270
“She lets you have a cheat sheet for tests, so !”
MATH200
“3 hard tests.”
MATH251

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention , and some easy tests in positive reviews, so the overall online exam style is strict but inconsistent by course.

Strict GradingOral TestsWeekly TestsTest Heavy
“forgetting a unit results in a 50% deduction.”
MATH251
“ORAL tests because she thought all of her online classes cheat.”
MATH270
“ .”
MATH251

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Definitely be ready to learn all of Calc 2 on your own if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She reviews homework for about 80% of the class and in the last 20 minutes goes over new hard topics.”

⚖️

15/100

“Using a method not taught by her results in a 100% deduction.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“literally 70 questions for .”

👍 Positive Learning

70/100

“Very good professor. and a great summary of course content.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches like she is talking to herself, rather than her class.
  • Her class is quite fast paced, she usually doesn't leave much time for questions during lectures because she tries to go through as much material as possible.
  • She works very hard genuinely for students to learn materials.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Do not register for her if .
  • no one got good grades in if you care about gpa
  • The way she grades test is a total mystery, she grades based on how she is feeling that day.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload and Exams

  • There were four tests (about one every other week and then a final) and .
  • .
  • You don't have to do all the hw to pass if

Theme 4

❤️ About Support

  • she is 100% willing to help if you are willing to ask.
  • and caring.
  • She is always available for help, she wants us to learn well and move to the next level.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

92

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years and both formats provide rich, consistent evidence of high difficulty despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 538
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 538

Course coverage

MATH25115 reviews
MATH27014 reviews
MATH2528 reviews
MATH2006 reviews
MATH2414 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH1202 reviews
CALC2521 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 4 · A- 3

B range

13

B+ 5 · B 6 · B- 2

C range

9

C+ 4 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 8