AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Sandra Li

ACTG144 · ACTG100 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

She is worth considering for structured, practical accounting work, but online students should expect to use office hours .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPractical QuickBooks skillsMixed online supportStraightforward assignmentsCaring in personStrict grading complaints
  • In-person reviews are very positive and describe a .
  • Online reviews are sharply mixed, with one strong practical success story and two complaints about poor help or .
  • The course can be easy when instructions and resources align, but frustrating when students need timely support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Grades look very attainable when students follow the steps, though easy A.

, while online reviews are mixed because one student calls the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material can be practical and step-by-step, but outdated online resources can add unnecessary troubleshooting.

In-person evidence describes straightforward work, while online evidence ranges .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

The reviews do not clearly prove a , but online support may depend on attending office hours.

Online reviews mention office-hour dependence, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and practical, but online support and grading issues create real risk.

, while online reviews are split between strong praise and serious frustration.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

Some students earned high grades easily, but online reviews include a and .

Format shift

, while online grading has the clearest harshness complaint.

Workload

Light

74/100

One student finished quickly and described short chapter work, but online issues can make the workload feel heavier.

Format shift

In-person workload appears very light, while online workload depends on how well the materials match the current software.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Her teaching is praised as practical and caring in some reviews but criticized online for and limited help.

Format shift

In-person reviews are excellent, while online reviews are inconsistent and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

The course appears driven mainly by textbook steps, QuickBooks practice, chapter work, and graded assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize practical assignments, with only one online tag mentioning tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

professor, clear work, quick responses, and real-world examples.

Main concern

The small sample is very positive but too limited to prove consistency.

What students said

“The course is VERY straight forward”
ACTG100
“Great lecturer she wants all her students to get an A”
ACTG100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and serious frustration over support, grading, and outdated materials.

Main concern

Students may need to troubleshoot independently and use office hours for help.

What students said

“The textbook and shared videos were practical and easy to follow.”
ACTG144
“ .”
ACTG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“read the chapter and walk through some instructions (like 30-60 min a chapter AT MOST).”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting format differences in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“Great lecturer she wants all her students to get an A and .”

📘 Practical Value

68/100

“my coworkers were surprised by how much I knew without any prior experience.”

⚖️

54/100

“ will lower your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The textbook and shared videos were practical and easy to follow.
  • .
  • Great lecturer she wants all her students to get an A

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The course is VERY straight forward
  • will lower your grade.

Theme 3

💬 About Support

  • won't

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews are available, and the .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACTG1004 reviews
ACTG1441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values