AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Jackie Santizo

ETHN101 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take only if you can manage heavy reading and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy readingTough graderSlow gradingUnclear expectationsInteresting material
  • Students often find the ethnic studies material interesting but say the .
  • The , and tough deductions without enough feedback.
  • Some students earn A grades, but most .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students received A grades, but comments say , and careful work under tough grading.

Online reviews , while in-person reviews suggest completion is manageable if .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The course material is not described as conceptually impossible, but the and .

Both formats mention interesting content with , though online reviews are more frustrated by expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but deadlines and .

Online evidence focuses on due dates and extensions, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students hesitate or warn against taking the class because , and communication reduce the value of the course.

Online reviews are mostly negative with a few strong positives, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough grader and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest evidence of , while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload often includes long weekly readings, videos or podcasts, tests, discussions, and multiple weekly assignments.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are frequent, while and podcasts.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students say the material can be interesting, but , and limited communication.

Format shift

Online reviews include both praise and frustration, while but still mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention readings, discussion posts, tests, assignments, podcasts, and an .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests and discussions more often, while and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person evidence is limited but , and some interesting topics.

Main concern

The and limited feedback.

What students said

“The topics are super interesting, however the length of the content was hard.”
ETHN-101
“Learning a lot, but too much work.”
ETHN-101

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but mostly critical, with , and occasional praise for interesting content.

Main concern

Students may not know their standing because and .

What students said

“about to end course in 2 days and she has graded maybe half of the assignments/tests!”
ETHN-101
“She gives 50 page reading each week along with a test and a discussion post.”
ETHN-101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is inconsistent, with some students mentioning tests or quizzes and others saying there was .

Some online comments mention tests or quizzesOne online comment says no midterm or finalOptional final mentioned in one online review

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy, proctoring method, book policy, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews mention tests, multiple-choice quizzes, in one term, and an , but do not prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Optional Final MentionedNo Midterm Or Final MentionedMultiple-Choice Quizzes MentionedTests Mentioned
“there's an and i literally have no idea if i should do it or not”
ETHN-101
“She didn't give a ”
ETHN-101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned a lot, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Load

25/100

“She gives 50 page reading each week along with a test and a discussion post.”

⚖️

28/100

“I go above and beyond on every assignment and .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“The podcasts always gave me chills, and the videos we watched were quite engaging.”

Theme 1

📚 About Reading And Workload

  • She assigns soooo much reading (multiple 40 page articles within a week).
  • and a video/podcast every week.
  • Expect 4 assignments per week.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • She .
  • She wants long responses with quotes embedded, but does not state that in .
  • I feel sometimes she deducts points just for the heck of it.

Theme 3

💡 About Course Content

  • The topics are super interesting, however the length of the content was hard.
  • I actually found it interesting.
  • Professor Santizo is passionate about the subject and provides interesting content for her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 16 recent reviews include detailed workload and , though .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ETHN-10116 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 3