AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Evan Kaiser

CRN32197 · ESL828 · ESL400 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
65%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Evan Kaiser if you want serious English improvement and , and active participation.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrong FeedbackHeavy HomeworkTough GraderCaring InstructorImproves Writing
  • Students often praise Evan Kaiser as caring, knowledgeable, structured, and and writing.
  • The course can produce A grades, but students repeatedly warn that the , and participation demands are high.
  • Online reviews are positive but limited, while learning value and frustration over tough grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A grades are common, but students repeatedly say they require heavy , and real effort.

Online evidence is limited and mixed by grade, while earned through substantial work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The content is intellectually demanding because students , and high language standards.

Online reviews sound more comfortable, but in-person reviews repeatedly describe ESL400 and ESL828 as difficult and work-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Several in-person reviews state that attendance, participation, and .

Online reviews do not clearly prove attendance rules, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

He is recommended for students who want real improvement, but not for students seeking low workload or .

Online reviews are positive but sparse, while about grading and workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough or and small mistakes.

Format shift

Strict grading evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, with online .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Many reviews mention tons of , and more than 10 hours a week of work.

Format shift

, while online reviews mention reading but give less workload detail.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most students describe him as caring, structured, respectful, knowledgeable, and .

Format shift

Both formats praise his teaching, but and also more negative experiences.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears , and some tests rather than only exams.

Format shift

, and test-heavy tags, while online evidence gives little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a caring and effective teacher with , but , and mandatory participation.

Main concern

Students who want an easy A may struggle with the workload and .

What students said

“It really takes a large amount of work to get an A.”
ESL400
“Tons of homework. Very small mistakes can also affect your grade. .”
ESL400

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are positive about his teaching, patience, respect, and enjoyable class style, but one online grade was a C+.

Main concern

The small online sample does not clearly show whether the workload or .

What students said

“Very nice and good professor. His class was enjoyable.”
CRN32197
“He is always respectful and .”
ESL400

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention in-class essays and a test-heavy tag, but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

In-Class EssaysTest Heavy MentionNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one test-heavy tag, but do not clearly prove closed-book, open-book, or strict proctoring rules.

In-Class EssaysTest Heavy Mention
“I and my buddies used iPads and phones for our in-class essays and .”
ESL400
“And be ready to participate in group discussions!”
ESL400

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to really improve English skills, he is the right one; however, if you just want an easy A, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“He teaches me how and efficient way.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“be prepared to spend more than 10 hours a .”

⚖️

28/100

“Very small mistakes can also affect your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Kaiser is a very inspiring educator!
  • He is always respectful and .
  • . It is improved my English skills.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It really takes a large amount of work to get an A.
  • This guy is difficult and amazing, but you have to put very very efforts to get an A.
  • Tons of homework. Very small mistakes can also affect your grade.

Theme 3

🧭 About Fit

  • If you want to !
  • If you want to really improve English skills, he is the right one; however, if you just want an easy A, .
  • The course is not hard, but the professor is a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across recent and older terms give detailed, consistent evidence about strong teaching, heavy workload, and .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESL40013 reviews
ESL8285 reviews
CRN321972 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 2 · A 12 · A- 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values