AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Harutiun "Harry" Nishanian

MATH253 · CALC3 · MATH222 · MATH252 · MATH225 · MATH130 · CALC1 · MATH251 · AA · MATH270 · 105 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
73.85%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will do the , and can handle a sometimes messy lecture style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring professorFair testsConfusing lecturesQuiz heavyAccessible outside class
  • Students consistently describe him as caring, patient, and helpful outside class.
  • Lectures can be disorganized or confusing, so , and self-study.
  • Grades are often fair or lenient, but , and delayed grade posting create stress.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic with steady homework, practice, and office hours, but quizzes and .

and show fair effort; the single online review says he is usually an .

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

Math content is not usually described as impossible, but , proofs, and .

; online evidence is too limited to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

, but lectures, quizzes, group work, and office help make showing up valuable.

In-person reviews mention optional attendance in some sections but frequent quizzes in others; online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and , while warning that lectures can be confusing.

; the only online review is mixed and low-confidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students often mention , and generous grading for shown work.

Format shift

; the single online review also calls him usually an easy grader.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, but , and practice work make the course steady rather than light.

Format shift

, and ; online workload evidence is too limited.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

He is widely seen as caring and helpful, though lecture organization and clarity vary sharply by student and course.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is detailed and mixed-positive; online teaching evidence is too thin for a separate conclusion.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades , and occasional assignments rather than large projects.

Format shift

and ; the online review gives no clear assessment breakdown.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a caring, fair professor whose tests are manageable with homework and practice, despite frequent complaints about .

Main concern

because lectures can be disorganized or .

What students said

“ ”
MATH270
“ , so I taught myself the whole semester.”
MATH251

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online and usually an , but warns against the textbook used in that section.

Main concern

The only online review gives too little evidence beyond textbook frustration.

What students said

“He's a and is usually an .”
MATH270

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally standard and sometimes forgiving through drops, corrections, practice guides, or partial credit, with .

Weekly QuizzesMidtermsFinal ExamDropped Lowest TestTest Corrections

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe quizzes, midterms, and , and partial credit in some sections.

Weekly QuizzesMidtermsFinal ExamDropped Lowest TestTest Corrections
“Wkly quizzes worth 20%, 2 exams worth 40% combined”
MATH253
“ . assignments and the final.”
MATH251

Online

The single online review does not clearly describe exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He truly cares about students and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“He truly cares about students and .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Lectures can be a and difficult to follow”

⚖️

76/100

“The and lecture problems.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • He truly cares about students and .
  • You can tell he really cares about his students

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , so I taught myself the whole semester.
  • He breaks down fairly complicated concepts very well
  • The lectures can be a and difficult to follow

Theme 3

📚

  • There are .
  • . assignments and the final.
  • and similar to the practice tests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

105

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent and detailed reviews create strong credibility, with , and uneven lectures.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 556
4 out of 519
3 out of 510
2 out of 510
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH25118 reviews
MATH2539 reviews
AA4 reviews
MATH2224 reviews
MATH2704 reviews
Show 5 more courses
CALC13 reviews
MATH2523 reviews
CALC32 reviews
MATH2252 reviews
MATH1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 2 · A 17 · A- 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

19

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 14 · Rather not say 1