AI Rate Professor

History

Tatiana Irwin

HIST201 · HISTORY201 · HIS83874 · HIS260 · HIST310 · HIS201 · HIS310 · HIST260 · CRN50661 · HIS210 · 73 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her if you want a demanding history class with strong feedback, but if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerReading HeavyTough GraderStrong HistorianGood FeedbackParticipation Driven
  • Students often , and support when they keep up with the work.
  • The main complaints are heavy reading, strict , and difficult projects or exams.
  • She is a better fit for students who want to learn history seriously than for students seeking a low-effort GE.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A grades are possible, but students repeatedly say they , and strict deadlines.

Online evidence includes and some easier sections, while and earned grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The history content is manageable for prepared students, but , and writing expectations raise the challenge.

Online reviews sometimes call the class easy, while as reading-heavy and advanced.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Attendance and participation often matter, and some reviews say skipping class hurts performance, but as .

; online reviews mainly discuss pacing, reading, and assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but many warn against her because of strict grading and workload.

Online reviews are somewhat more favorable, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many reviews call her a , and several students say late work, projects, exams, or .

Format shift

, but they are much more frequent in in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention , and history expectations that feel above a basic GE level.

Format shift

Both formats mention reading, while as disproportionate.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Her teaching is often praised as knowledgeable, passionate, helpful, and engaging, though .

Format shift

Online students more often praise organization and feedback, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments , and participation depending on the course.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments, quizzes, and feedback, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are sharply split between inspiring teaching and frustration with , and assignment expectations.

Main concern

, and little tolerance for late work.

What students said

“There is a lot of reading per week (roughly 25-30 pages per week), along with video and notes.”
HIS201
“An A is not given it is earned in this class so do your part and participate and stay on top of your work.”
HIST201
“There are no test but she makes up for it with lots of , and discussion boards.”
HIST260

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are more positive overall, with several students calling her caring and organized, but reading and strict AI rules still matter.

Main concern

Online and tough grading in some sections.

What students said

“The class is challenging but .”
HIST201
“She is very kind, she made the .”
HIS201
“Class is very easy, but .”
HIS201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

online tests, some project-heavy sections, and strict academic integrity enforcement.

Online Tests MentionedOpen Notes MentionedNo Tests In Some SectionsProject-Heavy SectionsStrict Academic Integrity

Assessment risk

Varies

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes, and project-heavy grading, but no consistent exam policy is clearly proven.

Open Notes MentionedOnline Tests MentionedWeekly Quizzes MentionedProject-Heavy Grading
“Her exams are open notes so and discussions.”
HIST201
“Ms. and .”
HIST310
“Quizzes every week based off the textbook ($85), two major exams, lecture heavy, must show up to class, make sure you read, 3 projects”
HIST201

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams; they mainly mention quizzes, assignments, and strict AI policy.

Quizzes MentionedStrict AI PolicyFinal Optional Extra Credit Mentioned
“DO NOT use AI.”
HIST201
“She is very kind, she made the .”
HIS201
“Her class has field trips.”
HIST310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“An A is not given it is earned in this class so do your part and participate and stay on top of your work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She is knowledgeable, very helpful and .”

⚖️

28/100

“Such a .”

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“5x the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She truly knows so much history and !
  • Her lectures are so interesting and her passion for teaching you the truths of history makes you more intrigued.
  • She is a great teacher WHEN she teaches, but instead, she rants.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • An A is not given it is earned in this class so do your part and participate and stay on top of your work.
  • not an easy A have to work for it.
  • . Gives good feedback, but .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • There is a lot of reading per week (roughly 25-30 pages per week), along with video and notes.
  • There are no test but she makes up for it with lots of , and discussion boards.
  • This class is taking up most of my time, but it's only supposed to be an elective!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

73

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 50 reviews across many years, with consistent , and participation.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 513
3 out of 511
2 out of 58
1 out of 514

Course coverage

HIST20118 reviews
HIS20115 reviews
HIST3108 reviews
HIST2603 reviews
CRN506611 review
Show 5 more courses
HIS2101 review
HIS2601 review
HIS3101 review
HIS838741 review
HISTORY2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 6 · A 11 · A- 6

B range

9

B+ 5 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1