AI Rate Professor

English

Katherine Webster

ENG110 · ENGL100 · LIT201 · ENGLISH100 · ENG105 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
59.09%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

She is a strong choice in person, but online ENG110 carries major workload and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong feedbackCaring in personHeavy online workloadStrict AI policyEssay focused
  • In-person students overwhelmingly praise her as caring, helpful, and feedback-focused.
  • Recent online ENG110 reviews report heavy workload, , and severe AI-detection disputes.
  • Her classes can reward effort, but the experience differs sharply by format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Good grades are and process work, but and workload can make the A feel costly.

In-person evidence suggests fair reward for effort, while online ENG110 .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The and scaffolded, though the volume of reading, essays, and process assignments adds difficulty.

, while online reviews describe too many requirements for a general education class.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Participation and writing-center meetings matter, but the evidence does .

Online reviews mention required meetings and no late work, while in-person reviews stress .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but recent online reviews strongly warn against the workload and grading policies.

, while online reviews are sharply divided and recently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

but online students report , and severe AI-policy penalties.

Format shift

as fair and helpful, while as strict.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Many online reviews describe lots of assignments, reading, essays, writing-center requirements, and midweek due dates.

Format shift

Online workload is the main complaint, while as manageable with support.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Her and organization, but recent online reviews describe slow responses and condescending interactions.

Format shift

, while online teaching quality is inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and writing assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly very positive, , and engaging classes.

Main concern

Students should expect participation and reading, but .

What students said

“ , and is willing to accommodate to students based on their needs and circumstances.”
LIT201
“She always gives great feedback on assignments, offers opportunities, and is always willing to help you outside of the classroom ;)”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online and recent complaints about excessive work, no late work, tough grading, and AI-related zeroes.

Main concern

The main risk is a heavy online workload with strict policies and disputed AI accusations.

What students said

“Overall, a lot of work for no reason”
ENG110
“She would directly give you a zero credit if she think you use AI to generate your work.”
ENG110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews point to essay-based assessment rather than traditional exams, and .

Essay BasedNo Clear Exam EvidenceNo Midterms Or Final In ENG105

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention essay-centered grading, and one ENG105 review explicitly says there were .

No Midterms Or FinalEssay Based
“For ENG 105 we didnt have midterms or final, just 5 essays.”
ENG105

Online

Online reviews discuss essays, assignments, AI detection, and late-work rules, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Essay BasedAI Detection Dispute
“Turnitin marked one of .”
ENG110
“She would directly give you a zero credit if she think you use AI to generate your work.”
ENG110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and is quick to respond to emails.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting format differences in , and online policy risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Katherine is a fantastic teacher.”

📚 Workload Pressure

30/100

“The amount of workload for a low credit class? ”

⚖️

38/100

“Really really because of those little small mistakes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • and feedback, and is quite flexible.
  • She always gives great feedback on assignments, offers opportunities, and is always willing to help you outside of the classroom ;)
  • Very caring and !

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Overall, a lot of work for no reason
  • workload is ridiculous and for .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Risk

  • if you can't provide new material to proof your working process
  • She does not accept late work which for a online course is ridiculous.
  • I had to withdraw from the course and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across formats provide detailed but format-dependent evidence, with recent online reviews shifting more negative.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG11016 reviews
ENG1052 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
ENGLISH1001 review
LIT2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2