AI Rate Professor

Biology

Eileen Mackusick

NUT310 · BIO310 · BIOL310 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can manage heavy weekly writing and are comfortable aligning closely with her expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy weekly workloadDiscussion intensiveKnowledgeable about nutritionOpinion-sensitive gradingCaring but polarizing
  • The course content is usually not hard, but weekly discussions, readings, quizzes, and .
  • Older reviews are highly positive, while recent , and opinion-based grading.
  • Grades are often high when students keep up, but the experience can feel tedious and unfair.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

High grades are common, but students repeatedly say the A depends on staying ahead of , and projects.

Online evidence is heavier and more negative about workload, while but also says the work takes time.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Students often say the nutrition concepts are not difficult, but the course feels harder because of volume and writing demands.

, though online students complain more about tedious weekly tasks.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews emphasize participation and weekly deadlines, but they do not clearly prove a .

Online reviews focus on due dates and discussion participation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Many students praise her knowledge and care, but recent comments strongly warn against the workload and .

Online reviews are strongly polarized, while and mixed to change the overall caution.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades are often high, but several students report tough or .

Format shift

Online reviews contain the , while in-person evidence is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students , and projects as time-consuming.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly support a heavy workload, and .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often described as knowledgeable and caring, but recent reviews describe poor communication, rudeness, and weak course management.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are polarized, while and inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears , and projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and mixed, with some students praising reasonable structure and others calling the class demanding and opinionated.

Main concern

Writing load and three-credit class.

What students said

“Class is not hard, but be ready to write.”
BIOL310
“the work takes a lot of time but if you don't do it last minute you will be okay.”
BIO310
“expects too much of a 3 credit class.”
NUT310

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews dominate the evidence and show an easy-to-understand but and grading.

Main concern

Heavy weekly discussions and .

What students said

“ .”
BIOL310
“ .”
BIOL310
“If you do all your work, you should get an A.”
BIOL310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because multiple students mention and describe quizzes plus projects instead.

No MidtermNo FinalTimed QuizzesFinal ProjectWeekly Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and weekly quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Final ProjectWeekly Quizzes
“The consumption, which I really liked.”
BIOL310
“ and two projects.”
BIO310

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention , timed or weekly quizzes, and a , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, or open-book policies.

No MidtermNo FinalTimed QuizzesFinal ProjectWeekly Quizzes
“ .”
BIOL310
“ (but there are )”
BIOL310
“ of food.”
BIOL310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“ .”

👩‍🏫 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ and super knowledgeable about nutrition.”

🎯 Grade Path

62/100

“If you do all your work, you should get an A.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • .
  • The while in total, so I would be sure to give myself plenty of time.
  • Be ready to put aside a lot of time to do the work.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Changes grade just because it's based on opinion.
  • She will grade you harsher in the discussion boards if your opinion is different then hers.
  • There are no tricks and everything is pretty straightforward.

Theme 3

❤️ About Teaching Style

  • She is very knowledgeable and resourceful.
  • I learned a LOT!
  • She is a true gem and just over all THE BEST!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 27 reviews across several years with consistent workload themes, though recent reviews are more negative than older ones.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

BIOL31017 reviews
BIO3109 reviews
NUT3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 2 · A 12 · A- 5

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5