AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Behrooz Shahrvini

MATH120 · MATH200 · MATH251 · MATH268 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you attend, use the practice materials, and are willing to study for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsTest focusedSupportive math teachingPractice exams helpLecture heavy
  • Most students describe him as an excellent math teacher .
  • Grades depend heavily on tests, but , and partial credit make the system fair.
  • The class requires attention and studying, especially because lectures are long and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

An A is realistic with attendance and test preparation because and , but students still need to study.

Both formats support fair grading, with in-person reviews giving , and practice exams.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math content can be challenging, but students say he breaks difficult concepts down clearly.

Online and , while in-person reviews more often mention tough or fast-paced content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as strictly mandatory, but students say missing lectures can make you fall behind.

In-person reviews strongly stress attending lectures, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and provides strong support.

Both online and providing much stronger volume.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

but softened by similar practice tests, dropped lowest scores, , corrections, and partial credit.

Format shift

, while online reviews simply describe exams as fair.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, but some reviews mention lots of homework and long classwork.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews are more mixed.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students say , and prepares them well for exams.

Format shift

Both formats strongly praise his teaching, with in-person evidence much larger and more detailed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades rely heavily on tests and , and classwork.

Format shift

and a final, while online reviews also focus on exams and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and support while noting lecture-heavy classes and high exam weight.

Main concern

Students need to keep up with long lectures and do well on a .

What students said

“everything taught in class is on the test.”
MATH200
“He thoroughly covers material in lectures and exercises and .”
MATH200
“ and practice tests.”
MATH251

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive, emphasizing , and doable homework.

Main concern

The small online sample limits certainty, but no major online-specific concern appears.

What students said

“ ”
MATH200
“He explains things clearly, encourages participation, gives well-written and fair exams”
MATH268

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are important and sometimes tough, but they are predictable because and classwork closely match them.

Practice Tests Similar To ExamsDropped Lowest TestFinal ExamExtra CreditTest Corrections

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe a test-heavy course with practice tests similar to exams, a dropped lowest test, and sometimes corrections or , but .

4 TestsFinal ExamDropped Lowest TestPractice Tests Similar To ExamsTest Corrections
“We had 4 tests and a ”
MATH200
“ .”
MATH200
“ and offers 5-10% back on test corrections.”
MATH251

Online

Online reviews mention fair exams and practice tests, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Practice TestsFair Exams
“ ”
MATH200
“gives well-written and fair exams”
MATH268

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Excellent instructor and engaging.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and workload. Credibility rating: High.

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Excellent instructor and engaging.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“If you're worried about taking a .”

📝

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He explains things clearly, encourages participation, gives well-written and fair exams
  • Even the most difficult topics are explained clearly and simply.
  • he will break it down for you.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • everything taught in class is on the test.
  • 4 tests+final, lowest test score is dropped.
  • and practice tests.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Homework and expectations are very reasonable.
  • Lots of homework, but at least he gives a week (sometimes more) to complete.
  • Daily office hours and a fairly light amount of HW.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 21 reviews with strong consistency across recent and older comments, though a few vague negative reviews reduce certainty slightly.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH20014 reviews
MATH2513 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH2682 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 4 · A 8

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2