AI Rate Professor

English

Laura Woltag

ENGL161 · ENG161 · ENGL105 · ENG110 · ENGL100 · IDST101 · ENGL165 · ENG105 · ENGL110 · ENG100 · ENG165 · IDST110 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a , but expect participation and steady writing work.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaring and flexibleEasy A with completion gradingStrong writing feedbackParticipation heavyManageable reading and essays
  • Most students describe her as caring, flexible, and helpful with writing.
  • Grades are usually very forgiving because many assignments use complete/incomplete grading, revisions, extensions, or .
  • The main downside is frequent participation, group work, reading, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Getting an A is very easy if students complete the work, participate, and use the and revision options.

Both formats support an easy A, while online reviews add more evidence of extensions and redo opportunities.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The content is usually described as straightforward English reading, discussion, and .

Both formats describe manageable content, though and group discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

She is flexible with communication and deadlines, but and .

Online evidence stresses deadline flexibility, while up and participating.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Most students strongly recommend her because , and .

Both formats are strongly positive, with a few in-person participation complaints and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

94/100

Grading is often complete/incomplete, light, revision-friendly, and supported by .

Format shift

Both formats show generous grading, with especially clear in-person evidence about complete/incomplete essays.

Workload

Light

80/100

Work is usually manageable, though several older in-person reviews mention lots of .

Format shift

Online reviews call the workload manageable, while because of participation, groups, and homework.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students , and willingness to help them improve.

Format shift

Both formats support excellent teaching, with online reviews emphasizing organization and responsiveness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Grades appear , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews , and easy completion-based assignments, with participation as the main recurring requirement.

Main concern

Students who dislike discussion, groups, or participation may find the class annoying despite the .

What students said

“This class is incredibly easy.”
ENG110
“They grade super lightly and wants you to actually learn about the material.”
ENG100
“ .”
ENG165

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are mostly very positive, with , and one complaint about unfair grading.

Main concern

One online reviewer found the , and participation or .

What students said

“Super easy class and caring professor.”
ENGL105
“Workload is also manageable considering it's an English class.”
ENG110
“ .”
ENG110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest the course is mostly assignment-based, with little exam pressure and exam.

No Clear Exam EmphasisNo Final Exam Mentioned In One ReviewAssignment-Based Grading

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

92/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence points to writing and assignments rather than exams, with one review .

No Final ExamIn-Class EssayShort PresentationAssignment-Based Work
“ and but a short presentation.”
ENGL100
“The .”
ENG100

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove an , and , and grading.

No Clear Exam PolicyAssignment-Based Work
“She lets you redo any assignment you don't receive full credit on.”
ENGL105
“ "”
ENG105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If u want a teacher who actually cares about u and wants 2 engage, this is it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Prof. Woltag is and is always willing to help you out with your papers.”

📈 Easy A Reality

96/100

“Everything is graded on complete/incomplete so you don't have to stress about getting an A.”

⚠️ Participation Fit

62/100

“she strongly wants her students to actively participate in the class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Woltag is a succeed.
  • They helped me feel confident in my writing and also prepared.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • IF U WANT AN A.
  • Really easy to pass the class and what they look for.
  • as long as you meet the bare minimum requirements for the .

Theme 3

💬 About Participation & Workload

  • The at all and are very easy.
  • It is a lot of participation as well as 2 books and 4 essays, but she is a really accommodating professor.
  • There are a lot of groups, every time I walked into class we got into groups

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 35 reviews span many years, both formats are represented, and themes are detailed and consistent.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL1007 reviews
ENG1106 reviews
ENG1003 reviews
ENG1053 reviews
ENGL1053 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGL1103 reviews
ENGL1653 reviews
ENGL1612 reviews
IDST1102 reviews
ENG1611 review
ENG1651 review
IDST1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 7 · A 15 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2