AI Rate Professor

Communication

Leif Rogers

COMM130 · COMM110 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you can handle lecture-heavy classes and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy CreditLecture HeavyPicky RubricsProject BasedConsiderate
  • and fair, but lectures are often described as boring or draining.
  • The class is easy to pass, but and directions must be followed carefully.
  • Online reviews suggest more weekly work and mixed teaching value, while and projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is realistic because the class is easy, but students must follow directions, attend, and .

Online evidence says Easy A/B with weekly work, while and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students often call the concepts common knowledge and the class straightforward.

Both formats describe easy content, but online adds more recurring written work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and is tied to lecture questions or passing.

In-person evidence clearly mentions mandatory attendance, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

, but students are split because lectures can be boring and .

In-person recommendations are mixed but somewhat stronger, while online reviews are divided on learning value.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades are achievable, but multiple students mention and .

Format shift

, while online reviews mention extensions and easy tests.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

, but projects and , and reflections create steady work.

Format shift

Online workload is heavier with weekly writing, while but .

Teaching experience

Average

65/100

He is nice and , but repeated comments describe boring lectures, vague directions, and limited learning.

Format shift

and boredom, while online reviews are more skeptical about teaching effort.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades appear , and participation rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online assessment uses weekly quizzes and writing, while and lecture participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an and sometimes picky grading.

Main concern

Lectures can be boring, attendance may be mandatory, and .

What students said

“ to questions from the lecture.”
COMM130
“ rubric.”
COMM130

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews say the class is easy to pass but , and limited teaching impact.

Main concern

Online students may face steady weekly writing work and a course that feels low effort or not very educational.

What students said

“Not an amazing teacher, but an easy class to pass for credit.”
COMM110
“Be ready for a 500-word discussion post with a 150-word response to ur classmate and a one-page reflection every week.”
COMM130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because tests are described as easy and assessment is mostly projects, quizzes, and writing, with .

Weekly QuizzesEasy TestsProject HeavyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam policy and mostly describe projects, lectures, and attendance work.

Project HeavyAttendance Questions
“Course is pretty but will still get good grade.”
COMM130
“One solo and two group .”
COMM130

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and very easy tests but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Weekly QuizzesEasy Tests
“Weekly quizzes and the as long as .”
COMM130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super easy class but didn't learn anything (course content was common knowledge).”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“The most boring lecture but he teaches well and .”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“Extremely easy class as the concepts are common knowledge.”

⚖️

58/100

“ rubric.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Rogers shows great enthusiasm for the subject of communication.
  • He is a but it is just a terrible class.
  • His and he answers students' questions well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class is straightforward and easy to pass.
  • Easy A/B.
  • Not necessarily a but very by the book that .

Theme 3

⚠️

  • to questions from the lecture.
  • Be ready for a 500-word discussion post with a 150-word response to ur classmate and a one-page reflection every week.
  • Leif Rogers doesn't give any homework .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 10 reviews show consistent patterns, but only two online reviews limit format-specific confidence.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMM1307 reviews
COMM1103 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1