AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Minu Mathur

SOCI121 · SOC105 · SOC100 · S0CI141 · SOCI100 · 162 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
49.23%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you are comfortable teaching yourself and carrying group work when needed.

Best fit · Self Taught ProGroup-project dependentSelf-taught structureTough grading momentsBoring or limited lecturesEasy credit risk
  • The course can be easy for credit, especially SOC100, but grades often depend on assigned groups.
  • Many students complain that she teaches little, relies on documentaries or readings, and .
  • Recommendation is sharply mixed because group work and organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

SOC100 can be an easy A if you do the work and get a decent group, but , and .

Online reviews lean easy for SOC100 but warn about groups, while , and self-teaching concerns.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is usually basic and manageable, but students often , and self-study.

Both formats describe easy material, but and in-person students mention weak class-time teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some hybrid sections feel skippable study hall, while and in-class videos matter.

Online attendance is mostly not central, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students recommend her for easy credit only when , and self-guided learning.

Both formats are mixed, with online complaints focused on communication and in-person complaints focused on study hall-style class meetings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

37/100

Many students get A grades, but repeated comments , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough timed exams and , while in-person reviews mention deductions, attendance, and .

Workload

Moderate

47/100

SOC100 can be light, but , and exams create uneven workload.

Format shift

Online workload depends heavily on group assignments and readings, while , and classwork in some sections.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Many students say she is kind, but the dominant complaint is minimal , and poor organization.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize communication and Canvas structure, while in-person reviews often describe class as study hall or self-taught.

Assessment method

Balanced

63/100

Grades combine group assignments, readings, documentaries, quizzes, presentations, papers, midterms, and courses.

Format shift

Online courses often use group projects and exams, while , and attendance-linked classwork.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews also report easy credit in some sections, but many students say class time is study hall, lectures are boring, and group work drives the grade.

Main concern

Students and rely on assigned groups for major grades.

What students said

“BEWARE OF GROUP WORK.”
SOC100
“One month into the semester, she hasn't taught a single thing.”
SOC100
“ , and assigns classwork so it's important to show up.”
SOC100

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with some easy-A experiences but many complaints about weak communication, group projects, self-guided Canvas work, and .

Main concern

Bad groups and limited instructor engagement can make the online course stressful despite easy material.

What students said

“Barely learned anything, documentary heavy”
SOCI100
“this class is really easy as long as you get a good group for group projects.”
SOC100
“This professor had terrible communication skills.”
SOC105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

quizzes in SOC100 to strict timed essay exams in SOCI121.

Multiple ExamsTimed Essay ExamsOpen Book QuizzesStudy Guide Based TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

44/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and one open-book quiz report, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Tests And QuizzesMidterm And FinalOpen Book QuizzesStudy Guide BasedPresentations
“3 quizzes open book, impossible to fail.”
SOC100
“Be sure use the .”
S0CI141
“you're graded on 4 tests, 4 quizzes, 2 presentations and your notebook for journal entries.”
SOC100

Online

, and prepared topics, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules except where stated.

Timed Essay ExamsMultiple Choice ExamsMakeup ExamsPrepared TopicsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Grades based mostly on 3 major tests, with a 90 min ”
SOCI121
“There were 3 midterms and a and as well.”
SOC100
“ the topics beforehand.”
SOCI121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“BEWARE OF GROUP WORK.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grade risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“One month into the semester, she hasn't taught a single thing.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

45/100

“ unless required.”

⚖️ Grade Tradeoff

64/100

“Technically, this course is easy.”

Theme 1

👥 About Group Work

  • BEWARE OF GROUP WORK.
  • If you get a bad group you'll be stuck with either a bad grade or stuck doing all the answers yourself.
  • Group work is a must, so make sure you have a solid group.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She barely teaches anything.
  • You basically learn all the material yourself.
  • The lectures are extremely boring and tedious.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If and don't receive an A your either to busy for school or lazy.
  • so I'd say watch out for that.
  • it was surprisingly hard to get good grades on the timed exams because of how difficult the questions were

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

162

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across eight years and both formats give detailed, consistent , and teaching style.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 542
4 out of 535
3 out of 531
2 out of 534
1 out of 520

Course coverage

SOC10029 reviews
SOCI1009 reviews
SOCI1215 reviews
S0CI1413 reviews
SOC1053 reviews
Show 1 more courses
1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 5 · A 16 · A- 1

B range

13

B+ 6 · B 7

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1