AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Geri Lamble

CIS117 · CIS254 · CIS110 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
15.79%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you already know the material and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear assignmentsHard to reachStrict formattingSelf-taught codingTough grading
  • Many students say the , and .
  • Grades can still be high for students with prior coding experience and strong independence.
  • Strict formatting and slow or unhelpful responses are recurring problems.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A grades are possible, especially with prior coding knowledge, but , and stressful effort.

Online reviews show some A outcomes with self-teaching, while the and includes one easy-A claim.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The programming content can be beginner-level, but and missing support make it feel much harder.

Online sections are challenging mainly because , while and unsupported exam content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , and most issues are about access, response time, and course structure.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and .

Online reviews dominate the evidence and are mostly negative, while but also mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly mention strict , and tough point deductions.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest strict-grading evidence, while .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students report , and stress from unclear assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework and extra self-teaching most often, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many comments say she does not teach clearly, is hard to access, and leaves students to learn from textbooks or modules.

Format shift

Online complaints focus on async disorganization, while and poor access.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews , and formatting-based grading.

Format shift

and exams, with online reviews giving more detail about labs and formatting rules.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but mostly negative, with and poor access.

Main concern

Students report , and material appearing on assignments or .

What students said

“Literally not accessable outside of class and doesn't know what she is doing.”
CIS110
“Ms. and .”
CIS110
“if you read the text-book, along with the online modules and lectures you should have a easy A”
CIS117

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students often describe async courses as , and dependent on textbooks or prior coding knowledge.

Main concern

Students struggle with , and limited useful help.

What students said

“the textbook literally did all of the teaching.”
CIS117
“Her lecture notes don't help and you really have to rely on your previous programming experience”
CIS117
“ . .”
CIS117

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and grading evidence points to strict formatting and .

Strict FormattingNo Partial CreditMultiple Choice TestsExam Errors

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove format, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Unsupported Exam Content
“She includes info. in lectures, powerpoints, or the textbook.”
CIS110

Online

, and strict code execution rules, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Multiple Choice TestsExam ErrorsStrict Code ExecutionNo Partial Credit
“be really careful on the exams.”
CIS117
“The very difficult to understand what she wanted us to answer.”
CIS254
“The and multiple choice.”
CIS117

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and thank me later”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“the textbook literally did all of the teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“If your code doesn't run correctly in the designated environment you will not get even partial credit.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • doesn't even teach her own class.
  • Her video and note lectures are really

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She grades unnecessarily tough.
  • . .
  • Strict on formatting

Theme 3

💻 About Online Learning

  • To be honest, she's a nice lady. But her online class is just a mess.
  • terribly formatted website for the class which doesn't provide any meaningful learning.
  • you really have to rely on your previous programming experience

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across several years show a consistent pattern of , and self-teaching.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CIS11712 reviews
CIS1104 reviews
CIS2543 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3