AI Rate Professor

English

William Clark

CRN95341 · ENGL105 · ENG110 · ENG838 · ENGL100 · ENGL110 · 38129ENGL838 · ENG100 · ENGLISH110 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
68.97%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take him if you can handle frequent writing and want a forgiving, feedback-heavy English class, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLabor-Based GradingExtra Credit PathHeavy Writing LoadSlow GradingCaring Feedback
  • , but A-level results often require steady completion or extra labor.
  • Students , and engaging classes, especially in person.
  • The and writing, slow grade updates, and occasional weak structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

69/100

A is realistic if you complete the work and use extra-labor options, but it is not effortless because the writing load can be large.

Online reviews stress extra assignments for an A, while as clear and manageable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The content is accessible for many students, but , and abstract themes keep it from feeling easy.

Online reviews describe higher asynchronous writing pressure, while and readings.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

but several in-person reviews saying participation and class presence matter.

Online evidence supports optional meetings, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and feedback, but negative reviews warn about workload, structure, and slow grading.

, while online reviews are more split over workload and A requirements.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

and make good grades reachable, though A-level outcomes may require extra labor.

Format shift

and forgiving, while online students more often complain about extra work for an A.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and extra labor.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy writing, with online reviews especially noting asynchronous workload and rising essay word counts.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many students describe him as caring, passionate, helpful, and engaging, but several .

Format shift

and office-hour help, while online reviews are more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear , and labor logs rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and writing; neither format clearly centers exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students more often describe engaging discussions, useful feedback, and grading and lots of work.

Main concern

The workload can be high and grades may arrive very late.

What students said

“There are A LOT of assignments though, but they aren't hard.”
ENG100
“ so you can easily plan for the grade you want in the class”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise his care and flexibility but warn that the asynchronous workload and extra-labor path can be demanding.

Main concern

Getting above a B and sustained writing.

What students said

“If you wanted an A, you had to do 3 extra-labor assignments, which are no ez jokes.”
ENG110
“zoom meetings are not required but there are office hours you can join.”
ENGL105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest the course is mainly writing- and assignment-based, with some easy reading quizzes and .

No Exams Clearly ReportedReading QuizzesNo In-Class Essays

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes, and one older review saying there were no exams.

No In-Class EssaysEasy Reading QuizzesNo Exams Reported
“No in-class essays.”
ENGL105
“ .”
ENG100

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His class is great. He uses a , so as long as .”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

78/100

“I really enjoy all the lectures given by Professor Clark.”

Grade Path

69/100

“ so you can easily plan for the grade you want in the class”

Workload Risk

32/100

“There are A LOT of assignments though, but they aren't hard.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • He is a very knowledgeable, passionate and to help the student.
  • chill guy and makes you want to be in class al the time.

Theme 2

Grades And Workload

  • If you wanted an A, you had to do 3 extra-labor assignments, which are no ez jokes.
  • He's not strict on deadlines and very forgiving.

Theme 3

Main Complaints

  • He graded all assignments from the beginning of the .
  • We went 1 month behind in .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty reviews across many years and both formats give consistent themes about , and .

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG11010 reviews
ENG1006 reviews
ENGL1055 reviews
ENGL1104 reviews
38129ENGL8381 review
Show 4 more courses
CRN953411 review
ENG8381 review
ENGL1001 review
ENGLISH1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 5 · A- 5

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1