AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Azatullah Noori

PLSC110 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid this professor if possible, because the , and a high-effort class with little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear StructureTough GradingWeak FeedbackLecture HeavyAvoid
  • All three reviews rate the teaching experience very poorly and none recommend the professor.
  • Students report , and disengaging lectures.
  • Assessment feels frustrating because , and exams may cover material not taught clearly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A may be possible, but , and unclear expectations that make the grade costly.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course feels hard because structure, pacing, communication, and lecture clarity are weak rather than because students praise rigorous content.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly advise , and disengaging class sessions.

All , and it is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students call him a and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and both .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The workload is not fully detailed, but , and mini-paper exams make the class feel burdensome.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews consistently describe unclear , and disengaging lectures.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and all three are strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams that are mini papers, so it is not purely exam- or assignment-based.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are uniformly negative, citing unclear structure, unhelpful feedback, lecture-heavy delivery, and frustrating assessments.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves while dealing with and .

What students said

“The , and reliable communication.”
PLSC-110
“ ANY other professor”
PLSC-110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but negative, with one review saying exams were mini papers that sometimes covered topics not mentioned in class.

Mini-Paper ExamsTopics Not Mentioned In Class

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, proctoring, or final format.

Mini-Paper ExamsTopics Not Mentioned In Class
“ topics not mentioned in class.”
PLSC-110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ANY other professor”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

12/100

“Professor Noori's content is not very engaging and hard to learn from.”

Recommendation Risk

5/100

“just if .”

20/100

“He , and the ”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • The , and reliable communication.
  • Professor's lectures never include student participation; he rambles and asks questions that he ends up answering himself anyway.

Theme 2

Feedback And Grading

  • He , and the
  • then gives you an 8/10 on the homework.

Theme 3

Assessments

  • Assignments appeared on Canvas without context, and .
  • topics not mentioned in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent, detailed, and consistently negative.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PLSC-1103 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1