AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gurutam Thockchom

MATH251 · MATH200 · MATH130 · STATC1000 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
84.62%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a supportive math professor where showing up, participating, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveEasy extra creditClear gradingHelpful test correctionsEngaging math lectures
  • Most students describe him as caring, funny, and .
  • Grades are very reachable because of , and .
  • A , but the dominant experience is strongly positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A is very realistic if students attend, keep up with homework, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students say he makes math and statistics easier to understand, though a few find the lecture flow scattered.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

82/100

, but students say lectures and participation are important for success.

but is useful; there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and gives grade-repair opportunities.

Recommendations .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

, and test corrections make grading highly forgiving.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

but usually described as manageable or easy when students attend class.

Format shift

assignments per week, but rarely describe it as stressful.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students call him caring, engaging, funny, and effective, despite a small cluster of disorganization complaints.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to rely on homework, tests, group work, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews mention homework, tests, group work, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with students , and .

Main concern

Some students say lectures can be scattered or politically distracting.

What students said

“Prof , and wants everyone to succeed.”
STATC1000
“ but helpful.”
MATH251
“ .”
MATH200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are student-friendly because , and only a few tests.

Cheat SheetsTest CorrectionsExtra Credit On TestsFew Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are described as manageable, with , and available.

Cheat SheetsTest CorrectionsExtra Credit On Tests
“ !”
MATH251
“3-4 tests a semester with a cheat sheet and an opportunity for .”
MATH200
“He also .”
MATH130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the . Super fun class and easy work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“He made stats super easy to understand and has fun problems to work on.”

⚖️

90/100

“ and optional .”

👍 Recommendation

91/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof , and wants everyone to succeed.
  • Teaches the concepts in a way that is easy to understand.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you come to class and participate you will get a good grade.
  • but they're not even all that difficult.
  • but not stressful.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • , and wants his students to succeed.
  • .
  • Good communication with and due dates.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen recent reviews across several math courses are detailed and mostly consistent, with a few meaningful dissenting comments.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2006 reviews
MATH2513 reviews
STATC10003 reviews
MATH1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values