AI Rate Professor

Physics

Roxanne Moran

PHYS210 · PHYS220 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
53.85%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can tolerate inconsistent teaching and want a course where steady practice and can protect your grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed Teaching QualityExtra Credit AvailableLecture HeavyInconsistent TestsAttendance Graded
  • Student experiences and helpful to uncaring and ineffective.
  • Grades can be manageable because of , dropped work, and .
  • The biggest , and graded attendance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is realistic for prepared students because she offers , drops low scores, and , but experiences vary.

and dropped scores, while online reviews show A outcomes despite complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Physics content is and practice, but some students find tests disconnected and lectures ineffective.

and jarring tests, while online reviews are more polarized about lecture quality.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and grades attendance.

, while online reviews do not clearly describe attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on whether students value and structure enough to overlook inconsistent teaching and support.

Both formats are mixed, with online reviews slightly more polarized and and serious warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and dropped scores help, but multiple students report harsh grading or .

Format shift

and , while online reviews include easy grading and grading complaints.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework and practice are present but usually described as manageable except by some negative reviewers.

Format shift

Online students mention manageable work or busywork, while , and practice problems.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some students praising clear explanations and others reporting ineffective lectures and poor support.

Format shift

In-person reviews include clearer praise for lectures, while online reviews and technology.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear , and exams.

Format shift

Both formats mention assignments and quizzes and labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and but also report harsh grading, poor use of class time, and jarring tests.

Main concern

some students.

What students said

“ and she makes physics seem easy”
PHYS220
“ and ”
PHYS210
“ textbook”
PHYS220

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with some students finding the course manageable and others calling lectures ineffective and assignments disconnected.

Main concern

Online students may need to manage assignments independently when lectures or technology fall short.

What students said

“Expect some work if you're taking her online course”
PHYS220
“ ”
PHYS220
“ ”
PHYS220

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes seem standard overall, with some students saying they mirror examples and .

Weekly QuizzesTests Similar To ExamplesSome Jarring TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, with conflicting views on whether they are fair or jarring.

Weekly QuizzesTests Similar To ExamplesUnexpected Test Problems
“ examples”
PHYS220
“ textbook”
PHYS220
“quizzes and ”
PHYS210

Online

Online reviews mention assignments and but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvedAssignments In MasteringPhysics
“the majority of ”
PHYS220
“Definitely a chunk of ”
PHYS220

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“On the whole, pretty decent and not that .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ ”

⚖️

55/100

“She drops your lowest, well, everything, has ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

55/100

“ , though!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Moran teaches very thoroughly and at a slow pace, so it can be a little boring.
  • She did a good job explaining, but this was a double-edged sword and would sometimes explain a warmup for 45 min.
  • The lectures were not good, and sometimes the warm-up took an hour.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The and
  • She's an and and let you resubmit in class.
  • .

Theme 3

🧪

  • examples
  • textbook

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen recent reviews across online and but conflicting evidence.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHYS22011 reviews
PHYS2102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 8 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1