AI Rate Professor

Art

Sophie Touze

ART104 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you are genuinely interested in art history and can handle a heavy, detail-focused workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadStrict quizzesPassionate lecturesSpecific formattingMixed by format
  • Online reviews , and discussion formatting.
  • passion, support, and feedback.
  • This is not a good choice for students seeking an easy elective credit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible, but students describe , and very specific discussion requirements.

Online evidence is much harsher about the effort needed, while support.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course content is intellectually demanding because students must process dense , and writing.

Online reviews describe the content as harder to grasp, while but still substantial.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but participation and staying current appear important to success.

Online reviews emphasize keeping up with lectures and discussions, while and class engagement.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

39/100

Recommendation is split, but the dominant unless you want a serious art history workload.

Online reviews , while and recommend her for interested students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students repeatedly describe picky quizzes, strict rubrics, and specific answer expectations, even though some mention or .

Format shift

Online reviews , while in-person reviews include clearer criteria and .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Many students describe long lectures, heavy note-taking, frequent quizzes, and lengthy discussion writing.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are intense and frequent, while but framed more positively by some students.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Her passion and expertise are clear, but , and difficulty learning from the materials.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are strong, while online teaching reviews are sharply divided and often negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to , and a final rather than relying on only one method.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes and discussions, while , and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more favorable, emphasizing inspiration, support, and strong art expertise despite real workload.

Main concern

Students still need to put in sustained work and keep up with readings, quizzes, and exams.

What students said

“Be prepared to put your work in! 6-8 hours a week of video lectures, 2 essays a week ('discussions') 2 quizzes a .”
ART104
“Professor Touze is an incredible teacher.”
ART104
“Touze was very accommodating, this was my first art hist class and I am new to college.”
ART104

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and unclear wording.

Main concern

The online workload and quizzes feel excessive for many students.

What students said

“Every week is a new lecture with at least 60+ information-filled slides, takes 5 hours to read through and takes 5 hours to do the follow.”
ART104
“This is not the art if .”
ART104
“Great teacher, her lectures are interesting and engaging.”
ART104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and standard exams, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, or proctoring requirements.

Lengthy QuizzesSpecific AnswersMidterm ExamFinal ExamTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

midterm, and a final, but do not clearly prove book policy or .

Two Quizzes A WeekMidterm ExamFinal Exam
“2 quizzes a .”
ART104
“The reading assignments provided were extensive, and the the assigned material.”
ART104

Online

Online , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Lengthy QuizzesSpecific AnswersTest Heavy
“Lots of videos, lengthy quizzes with multiple possible answers for many questions, and a strict policy for the material”
ART104
“Quizes with 60+ questions - some questions have up to 12 answers whereas you must pick up to 7 correct answers from that must all be correct to obtain credit.”
ART104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is not the art if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Reality

12/100

“Every week is a new lecture with at least 60+ information-filled slides, takes 5 hours to read through and takes 5 hours to do the follow.”

🎯 Teaching Split

45/100

“Professor Touze is an incredible teacher.”

⚖️

30/100

“the specific answers that are not in the lectures”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Way too much work with little time given
  • The workload is immense.
  • this class will likely bloat your workload.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Touze is an incredible teacher.
  • Great teacher, her lectures are interesting and engaging.
  • Professor has poor english skills.

Theme 3

📈

  • She's an and the things she teaches are interesting but you have to write so much
  • easy A class and she says that.
  • The reading assignments provided were extensive, and the the assigned material.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 reviews span several years, include detailed comments, and show a consistent format-based pattern.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ART10418 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 4