AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Jessica Masters

CIS262 · CIS254 · CS111C · CIS255 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
96%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a supportive, high-quality computer science class where steady effort is strongly rewarded.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesCaring and responsiveExtra creditFair effortOrganized resources
  • Students overwhelmingly , and caring support.
  • The class , and Java practice, but students say the reward is fair.
  • and detailed feedback make strong grades realistic for students who stay engaged.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

A strong grade is very realistic with steady work because , and , but it is not a no-effort A.

Both formats support an EasyA judgment, with online reviews stressing flexible structure and and fairness.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Java and , but and examples make the material approachable.

Online and in-person reviews both say the material is manageable because her lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Reviews mention asynchronous online work, no Zoom classes, flexible due dates, and support when students communicate.

Online evidence is strongest for flexibility, while and some due-date flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students almost unanimously recommend her because , and rewards effort fairly.

Both online and in-person reviews are highly enthusiastic, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Grading is fair and , and many A-level outcomes.

Format shift

Both formats mention and fair grading, with online reviews also noting code checkers and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is manageable but often steady, with , and participation activities.

Format shift

Online reviews mention ZyBooks and weekly work, while and projects.

Teaching experience

Excellent

99/100

Students consistently call , and unusually helpful for learning computer science.

Format shift

Teaching quality is excellent in both formats because her videos and communication work well online and in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Grades appear based on , and some exams rather than exams alone.

Format shift

Online reviews describe homework, projects, participation activities, and exams, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also excellent, emphasizing organized videos, , timely responses, and strong learning support.

Main concern

Some sections are time-consuming and .

What students said

“It's a class that takes effort but is 100% fair.”
CIS255
“It will require 25 hours of work some weeks, but the .”
CS111C

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are excellent, with strong praise for lecture videos, responsiveness, flexibility, resources, and .

Main concern

, and structure is fair.

What students said

“The dumbest of people could understand and follow her lectures.”
CIS255
“As long as you watch the video lectures and use the ”
CIS255

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam requirements, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Homework And ExamsProjectsProgramming AssignmentsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and course effort, but do not clearly prove specific exam rules or proctoring policies.

ProjectsHomeworkNo Clear Exam Policy Evidence
“ for at least one.”
CIS255
“Focus on fine details, ask questions, and stay a week ahead if you can.”
CS111C

Online

Online reviews mention exams and assignments, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Homework And ExamsProgramming ProjectsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The homework and , but you are guaranteed a good score if you put in the effort.”
CIS255
“ and as annoying as the ZyBooks”
CIS262

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

99/100

“The teacher's lectures are very informative.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“If .”

⚖️ Fair Effort

84/100

“It's a class that takes effort but is 100% fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her videos are professional
  • Her youtube video lectures are very easy to follow.
  • She goes step by step and make sure students get the main concept of the topics.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very straightforward class. Amazing lectures and lots and lots of .
  • The coursework is easy but high quality
  • but doable if you study hard.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She has a genuine interest in helping students and .
  • and discussion threads

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five detailed reviews across several years and both formats show unusually consistent praise with concrete examples.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS25520 reviews
CIS2543 reviews
CIS2621 review
CS111C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 3 · A 8 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2