AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Lawrence McDevitt

ADMJ120 · ADMJ104 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you participate and pay attention, but be cautious about the online version.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate storytellerParticipation expectedEasy tests in personRespected practitionerWeak online support
  • In-person students overwhelmingly praise his experience, stories, clarity, and approachable personality.
  • The in-person course is usually easy if , and complete small assignments.
  • The single online review , and missing materials.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

In person, an A , and basic assignments, though the online review reports harsh grading.

, while the single online review suggests the opposite.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The content is straightforward for students who follow lectures, use the workbook, and complete small assignments.

, while the online review focuses on poor course delivery rather than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly tied to grades and success, .

Attendance expectations are clearly supported in .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend him for engaging lectures, real-world knowledge, and .

, while the only online review says to avoid him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

as straightforward and supported by notes, bonus material, and few major graded items.

Format shift

In-person grading seems lenient, while the .

Workload

Light

82/100

Most students describe the workload as manageable, with small assignments, readings, notes, and occasional easy tests.

Format shift

In-person workload is light, while the online review complains about poor materials and .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

He is widely praised in person as passionate, funny, respected, and knowledgeable, but online teaching is described as very poor.

Format shift

Teaching quality is strong in person but weak online based on the single online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

The course , and periodic tests rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

In-person evidence shows a mix of assignments and tests, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an engaging, experienced, and respected professor with manageable work and .

Main concern

Participation and classroom behavior matter, and he may call students out.

What students said

“Very manageable work load and adequate resources given for all the tests.”
ADMJ120
“Come to class and participate and pay attention and you will succeed.”
ADMJ120
“Make sure you don't have side conversations or use your phone in class or he'll call you out.”
ADMJ104

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is strongly negative and , and missing materials.

Main concern

Online .

What students said

“ .”
ADMJ120
“He doesn't respond to emails, grades you down but ”
ADMJ120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

as manageable with resources and notes, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Tests With ResourcesEasy Periodic TestsBonus Board

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

adequate resources and notes, but exact exam rules are not clearly proven.

Adequate Test ResourcesEasy TestsBonus Board
“adequate resources given for all the tests.”
ADMJ120
“ a(n) "A" when it comes to testing time.”
ADMJ120
“there's an .”
ADMJ120

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or proctoring policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Come to class and participate and pay attention and you will succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting in-person strengths, grade effort, and the online warning. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Super passionate Professor with a wealth of knowledge about law enforcement and criminal investigations.”

📈 Easy A Path

84/100

“Come to class and participate and pay attention and you will succeed.”

⚠️ Online Warning

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super passionate Professor with a wealth of knowledge about law enforcement and criminal investigations.
  • Very chill professor and has some amazing stories from his police days.
  • Professor McDevitt honestly is just the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very manageable work load and adequate resources given for all the tests.
  • As long as you write down his Bonus Board and a(n) "A" when it comes to testing time.
  • The class is super easy, and I'm really glad I picked it.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Expectations

  • Make sure you don't have side conversations or use your phone in class or he'll call you out.
  • Professor would get extremely annoyed at students for not participating enough.
  • He doesn't respond to emails, grades you down but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Nine recent reviews give consistent in-person evidence and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ADMJ1208 reviews
ADMJ1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values