AI Rate Professor

Art

Diana Corvelle

ART205 · ART231 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

Take her only if you want blunt art critique and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHarsh FeedbackStressful CritiquesExtra Credit OnlineUneven Experience
  • as severe and discouraging, especially in ART231.
  • One online ART205 review reports manageable pacing, feedback, resubmissions, and .
  • The main risk is not course content alone, but harsh critique and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A is very hard outside one positive ART205 online review, because many students report very low grades despite effort.

Online has one easy-grade ART205 report, while both online and in-person ART231 reviews emphasize harsh grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The , but students say the expected skill level and critique standards make the course feel hard.

Online ART205 sounds more manageable, while ART231 in both formats is described as demanding and stressful.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Participation is mentioned in tags, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Evidence comes from both formats, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because grading and though a few value her directness.

Online and in-person reviews both include strong negative recommendations, with isolated positive support in ART205.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Multiple students call her a and report never receiving high marks.

Format shift

and in-person ART231 reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

One online ART205 review reports light weekly work, but ART231 students describe the workload and as heavy.

Format shift

Online evidence is mixed by course, while task volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

She may give useful direct critique, but many students experience her feedback as .

Format shift

Both formats show the same split between respected directness and harmful critique style.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on , and resubmissions rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats describe assignment-based evaluation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are sharply split, with one strong defender and .

Main concern

Students may experience critiques as insulting or grades as impossible to improve.

What students said

“ know that you've got a gem.”
art205
“She will always find something to decrease your grade.”
ART231
“I'm a 4.0 student but never got higher than a C with her, usually a D or F.”
ART231

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, except one ART205 review that found the pace manageable and helpful.

Main concern

and harsh feedback make online ART231 stressful for weaker or newer artists.

What students said

“You can easily get a good grade because she also does offer .”
art205
“The assignments themselves and but it's the .”
ART231
“was constantly stressed about her work and .”
ART231

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam structure.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, final, closed-book, or exam policies.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The assignments themselves and but it's the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“The assignments themselves and but it's the .”

⚖️

12/100

“She will always find something to decrease your grade.”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“I would not recommend taking her class, it was a really negative environment.”

Theme 1

🎨 About Art Critique

  • That's how art instruction works! You need an art professor to be frank, direct!
  • She can be insulting/passive aggressive with her comments on your work if she doesn't like it.

Theme 2

📉 About Grades

  • You can easily get a good grade because she also does offer .
  • I'm a 4.0 student but never got higher than a C with her, usually a D or F.

Theme 3

😟 About Student Experience

  • Because of the class, I would cry when I had to do the work that was assigned for that week.
  • was constantly stressed about her work and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across , but the sample is small and course-specific.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ART2315 reviews
art2052 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 1