AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Natalia Gavryshova

MATH200 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless and and inconsistent grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesStrict attendanceHeavy homeworkInconsistent gradingLecture heavy
  • Students repeatedly describe unclear teaching and .
  • Attendance and classroom rules are strict and often frustrating.
  • A notes-on-tests policy helps, but grading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A is possible, but students , and unclear teaching that make the grade costly.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels challenging because lectures are and students say .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

as mandatory and strictly enforced even when absences are excused.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because unclear teaching, strict rules, and .

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students report tough or , though one review notes notes are allowed on tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Several reviews mention lots of homework and lecture-heavy structure with .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students often describe confusing explanations, poor organization, and needing to study independently.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and graded-by-few-things concerns more than balanced assessment.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and inconsistent grading, with only limited praise for caring support.

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves while following strict class rules.

What students said

“ studying”
MATH200
“ .”
MATH200
“ !”
MATH200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and test alignment concerns partly offset by one review saying notes are allowed.

Four Major ExamsNotes Allowed On TestsTests May Not Match Lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

from lectures, and one notes-on-tests policy.

Four Major ExamsNotes Allowed On TestsTests May Not Match Lectures
“has 4 major exams”
MATH200
“What she taught is different from the tests.”
MATH200
“She lets .”
MATH200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ studying”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She's a nice person, but her teaching skills are below average.”

⚖️

25/100

“ .”

📌

8/100

“ and when its excused she will still mark you as absent.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • studying
  • Lectures are straightforward but a bit dry.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There are lots of .
  • .
  • the class was challenging, but the

Theme 3

🚪

  • and when its excused she will still mark you as absent.
  • What she taught is different from the tests.
  • She lets .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews across several years show consistent concerns, but the sample is small and all from one course.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2005 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2