AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Tim Murphy

ESL828 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you value personality and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingFunny and CaringUnclear ExplanationsTough Online GradingGrammar Practice
  • Student opinion is sharply split between very engaging lectures and .
  • and serious complaints about clarity.
  • The only and lots of homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Grades can be good for some students, but comments do not show an easy A and the online .

Online evidence is tougher, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content can be manageable, but several students.

, while the single online review gives little content evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews praise showing up and participation but do .

Online mentions participation matters, and but do not prove a strict policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendation is split because several students love his class while others strongly warn against taking him.

The online review is negative, while and strong avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

The only direct grading comment says he is tough, though .

Format shift

Online evidence points to strict grading, while and less direct.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

but not consistently described as overwhelming across reviews.

Format shift

The online review has a Lots of , while and clarity.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching is polarizing, with strong praise for humor and care offset .

Format shift

, while the online review gives no teaching detail.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and Kahoot more than formal exams.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework and few graded items, while and class practice.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with some students praising his humor and help while .

Main concern

Teaching clarity varies widely by student experience.

What students said

“He's one of the .”
ESL828
“He has .”
ESL828

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only online review is negative and and homework.

Main concern

.

What students said

“He is a ”
ESL828

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

The online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If I could go .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He has good lectures.”

👍 Recommendation Split

43/100

“ .”

⚖️

35/100

“He is a ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He has good lectures.
  • He has .
  • " I don't know"

Theme 2

❤️ About Personality

  • He is a great teacher and is always funny/willing to help.
  • He's very knowledgeable and cares about students.
  • Never boring!

Theme 3

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • He is a
  • Every week we reviewed the topic with Kahoot games

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews span many years and show consistent polarization, but only one online review limits format confidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ESL8288 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1