AI Rate Professor

Communication

Frederick Berry

COMM110 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
3.85%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you are highly independent, resilient with , and willing to risk a poor grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh graderDisorganized courseUnclear instructionsPoor communicationAvoid if possible
  • Students overwhelmingly describe the course as , and poorly supported.
  • as harsh, arbitrary, inconsistent, and difficult to challenge.
  • Both online and class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Even strong students report earning low grades after heavy effort because , and unclear.

Online and online reviews adding more complaints about confusing course materials.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The subject may not be inherently advanced, but and disorganization make the course feel difficult.

and materials, while in-person students emphasize rigid speech and assignment expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation and meetings appear to matter in some sections.

Online reviews mention participation and missing office support, while and meeting expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

4/100

Students almost universally warn against taking him because of , and poor communication.

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

3/100

Students repeatedly describe grading as harsh, arbitrary, inconsistent, and .

Format shift

Both formats show severe grading complaints, with online reviews providing the most detailed evidence.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students mention many papers, reading, speeches, tests, and required graded items, with heavy effort often not rewarded.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reading, papers, and all graded assignments, while , and lecture demands.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Most students describe him as , and difficult to work with.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on unclear materials and poor email support, while and negative interactions.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews , and final essays rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers, speeches, essays, and graded assignments, while and speeches.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also very negative, with , and a hostile class experience.

Main concern

Students report and severe consequences for small mistakes.

What students said

“This dude is the ”
COMM110
“u ”
COMM110
“Frederick is easily the .”
COMM110

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, focusing on disorganized Canvas , and .

Main concern

Students say unclear expectations and .

What students said

“His canvas is all over the place and ”
COMM110
“Grades BEYOND harshly.”
COMM110
“DO YOURSELF A FAVOR, AND .”
COMM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyFinal EssaySyllabus QuizSpeechesGraded Assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a syllabus quiz, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Test HeavySyllabus QuizSpeeches
“u ”
COMM110
“expects you to meet with him if you dont a 100% on the ”
COMM110
“He has his own format outline that you have to follow”
COMM110

Online

Online reviews mention tests, speeches, papers, graded assignments, and a , but .

Test HeavyFinal EssaySpeechesGraded Assignments
“Tried to fail me ”
COMM110
“all letter graded assignments must be turned in to get a class grade”
COMM110
“Grades on topics rather than quality of delivery.”
COMM110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO YOURSELF A FAVOR, AND .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ ; the material for the online classes makes absolutely no sense”

⚖️

3/100

“Grades BEYOND harshly.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

4/100

“0/10 would not recommend.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His instructions are similar to a five year old explaining quantum physics.
  • His videos and .
  • and often does not have proper time for students that need extra help.

Theme 2

📉 About Grades

  • experienced in my life.
  • Despite the .
  • I worked VERY HARD to get the A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • This dude is the
  • unless you want to fail.
  • His class was a waste of my life.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews across several years and both formats are highly consistent in , and communication problems.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 522

Course coverage

COMM11026 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

8

C+ 3 · C 3 · C- 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2