AI Rate Professor

English

Emil DeAndreis

ENG110 · ENGL100 · ENG105 · ENGL110 · ENG100 · ENGLISH110 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and are ready to participate and write consistently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring Writing CoachStrong FeedbackEssay HeavyDiscussion BasedMixed Grading Experiences
  • Most students describe him as , and unusually strong at improving writing.
  • The class , and personal expression rather than tests.
  • A minority of students report writing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is realistic with steady effort, essays, and participation, but some students report and no-credit outcomes.

In-person reviews lean more manageable, while online and severe grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course is not conceptually hard, but , and .

Online students describe heavier difficulty more often, while and meaningful.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Participation and class community matter, and one student says missed classes are possible but not consistently.

Online reviews mention presentations and breakout rooms, while and presence without proving strict attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

, and writing growth, though a small group strongly warns about grading and workload.

, while online recommendation is more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Many students say he is chill or not too tough if work is done, but several online and .

Format shift

as fair or manageable, while online reviews contain the strongest tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The class commonly , and participation, but many students call the workload manageable.

Format shift

Online workload is described as heavy by some, while with enough time.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and ability to make writing more meaningful.

Format shift

Both formats include high praise, but online reviews show more uneven support experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

, and participation, with little evidence of exams.

Format shift

Both , and one online review explicitly says there is .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing , and manageable work.

Main concern

A few students report excessive workload, late class endings, or .

What students said

“This professor truly cultivates a community in the classroom!”
ENG100
“Course load is very manageable 4 essays& 4 main readings which were all actually interesting.”
ENG100
“The and I've taken Ochem and Physics.”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but and while warning that some students found grading harsh and the workload difficult.

Main concern

and support variance than in-person students.

What students said

“He but you need to do the homework.”
ENG110
“everyone dropped out because he grades very hard.”
ENG110
“ and has .”
ENGL110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course appears mostly writing-based, and the midterm.

No Final Or MidtermEssay-Based CourseExam Policy Not Central

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy and instead emphasize essays, readings, and discussions.

Essay-Based CourseNo Clear Exam Policy
“Course load is very manageable 4 essays& 4 main readings which were all actually interesting.”
ENG100
“5 essays, but he gives prompts at least a month in advance”
ENG110

Online

Online evidence explicitly reports and a focus on four papers.

No Final Or MidtermFour Papers
“ and has .”
ENGL110
“ ”
ENGL110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He genuinely cares about his students and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He teaches how to write, to read, and think differently.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ !”

⚖️

62/100

“ and gave me 0 on a 1200word essay.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor truly cultivates a community in the classroom!
  • .
  • Classes were filled with good discussions and some good and corny jokes.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • The class has 4 essays, and the .
  • good amount of reading, but very digestible.
  • Not only does he give an unreasonable amount of work but he also lacks empathy.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He genuinely cares about his students.
  • He really wants to help and see his students succeed.
  • and gives us a lot of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews across many years, formats, and courses provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence with some meaningful dissent.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1108 reviews
ENG1006 reviews
ENG1053 reviews
ENGL1103 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISH1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1