AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

B Shahrvini

MATHLAB · MATH · MATH200 · MATH222 · MATH112 · MAT120 · MATH120 · MATH130 · MATH110 · MATH251 · MATH275 · MATH270 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
65%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will attend, use the , and prepare for a test-heavy math class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math explanationsTest heavyPractice tests helpMixed pacingAccessible support
  • Most students praise his ability to explain math clearly and make hard topics understandable.
  • Grades depend heavily on tests, but and .
  • A noticeable minority say he moves fast, assigns lots of .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Many students earn A grades when they attend, do homework, and master the practice tests, but effortless.

and mostly positive, while online evidence is limited and mixed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Students often say he makes math understandable, but some courses still move fast and .

, while online reviews are too few to change the overall pattern.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly say going to class is important for success.

; online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

He is recommended by many students for clear teaching and .

, while online reviews are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Grading is generally fair because tests match practice materials, but and .

Format shift

, while one online review reports grading errors.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and practice-heavy, but many students see it as useful preparation rather than wasted work.

Format shift

than online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most reviews praise clear explanations, patience, humor, posted notes, and office-hour help, despite some complaints about pace.

Format shift

Both formats include positive teaching evidence, but the online sample is small and mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Grades are strongly exam-based, with and practice tests guide preparation.

Format shift

Both online and more detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and useful practice tests, though tests carry heavy grade weight.

Main concern

The class can be test heavy, fast paced, and homework intensive for weaker math students.

What students said

“The and as homework before each test that cover EVERYTHING that will be on the test.”
MATH200
“However, tests are 80% of your grade.”
MATH200

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between one strong praise for respectful help and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“He has consistent office hours every day, goes over topics well in the lectures displayed on his tablet.”
MATH200
“Tough grade or even wrong in grade the test.”
MATH275

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The but usually predictable through study guides, practice tests, and posted notes, with .

Test HeavyPractice TestsNo Notes ReportedNo Formula Sheet ReportedLowest Test Drop Reported

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe test-heavy grading, practice tests that closely match exams, and .

Test HeavyPractice TestsNo Notes ReportedNo Books ReportedNo Formula Sheet Reported
“He pretty much puts everything from the .”
MATH200
“you can use calculator but no notes no books no cheat and no formula sheet”
MATH270

Online

Online reviews mention tests and grading concerns, but do not clearly .

Test HeavyGrading Concern
“You will use the extra so that your paper wouldn't be deducted wrongly.”
MATH275

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'm not a fan of math but I found his lectures particularly easy to understand and comprehensive.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He is able to explain complex math concepts in understandable terms, which I find relatively rare.”

🧪

84/100

“However, tests are 80% of your grade.”

📘 Grade Strategy

66/100

“As long as you know how to do the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He explains everything until you understand it 100%.
  • He posts readable class lecture notes online for you.
  • Talks very fast, so no room to ask questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The material isn't hard to understand at all.
  • Tests are 80% of your grade.
  • Really easy to get A in his class.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload & Prep

  • He gives a lot of homework but you will learn from it.
  • , and .
  • Taking his class requires a lot of self-teaching and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews across many years, courses, and formats provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence on teaching, workload, and exams.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH20015 reviews
MATH1125 reviews
MATH2514 reviews
MATH2704 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH1202 reviews
MATH2222 reviews
MATH2752 reviews
MAT1201 review
MATH1 review
MATH1301 review
MATHLAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 7

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1