AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Jose Gutierrez

ENGR260 · ENGR210 · ENGR100 · ENGR215 · ENG210 · ENGR230 · ENGR270 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
91.3%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a supportive engineering professor and are willing and exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorClear grading criteriaExtra creditTest heavyHelpful office hours
  • Students overwhelmingly praise Jose Gutierrez as caring, inspiring, and helpful outside class.
  • His engineering courses are challenging, especially labs, coding, and exams, but and make strong grades realistic.
  • The , and some prerecorded or less engaging lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A is realistic because , partial credit, and and exams.

Online and in-person reviews both report challenging work with or support, while in-person reviews give more evidence of partial credit and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course content is often challenging, especially coding, CAD, labs, and fast engineering topics, but .

Online reviews focus on difficult ENGR215 labs and coding, while in-person reviews range from easy ENGR100 to harder upper engineering courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance is often important because labs, participation, and lectures directly support grades, but .

Online reviews emphasize office hours and study groups, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because , and makes difficult engineering material worth the effort.

Both online and providing broader long-term evidence across multiple courses.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

because students mention , partial credit, easy lab credit, and chances to improve tests.

Format shift

In-person reviews give stronger evidence of partial credit and lab credit, while online reviews repeatedly mention .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is manageable but not light because , and test preparation are repeatedly mentioned.

Format shift

Online ENGR215 reviews stress difficult labs, while plus labs, projects, and exams.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students consistently describe him as , and strong in office and uneven lectures.

Format shift

Both formats praise his support, but and lecture engagement.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and finals, though several courses are test heavy.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes labs and tests, while , labs, projects, midterms, and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise his care, clarity, and inspiration while , and .

Main concern

Tests and , and grades may be posted late.

What students said

“Engaging lectures with and exams.”
ENGR230
“You'll work for your grade though.”
ENGR230

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are positive but describe ENGR215 as , and and study groups.

Main concern

Labs and coding can feel difficult for beginners.

What students said

“Professor Gutierrez is a .”
ENGR215
“He is not an easy Professor but he really sets you up for engineering.”
ENGR215

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be hard and frequent, but comments mention partial credit, practice tests, cheat sheets, and .

Test HeavyCheat Sheet AllowedPartial CreditPractice TestsOptional Final In One Course

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe hard but fair exams with partial credit, practice tests, cheat sheets, and .

Partial CreditCheat Sheet AllowedPractice TestsOptional Final In One Course
“He tells you exactly what to put down to get at least partial credit for problems.”
ENGR230
“The but you get a cheat sheet.”
ENGR210

Online

Online reviews mention tests and preparation from labs, readings, and slides, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Test Preparation From LabsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Doing the labs and readings and studying the tests.”
ENGR215

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A great professor who actually cares. You'll work for your grade though.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“The .”

👍 Recommendation Level

92/100

“Professor Gutierrez is a .”

⚖️ Grade Value

78/100

“ , and he cares about and respects his students and is accessible during office hours.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures helped me a lot.
  • Makes even the hardest topics easy by his teaching skills.
  • His lectures and and helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You'll work for your grade though.
  • The but you get a cheat sheet.
  • He gives a fair amount of work and also lots of .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He always was there to walk you through it and he understands if you've never coded before.
  • A great professor who actually cares.
  • He truly inspired me to become a real engineer.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 23 detailed reviews across many years, courses, and both formats with highly consistent praise and repeated concerns.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR2159 reviews
ENGR1006 reviews
ENGR2103 reviews
ENGR2302 reviews
ENG2101 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGR2601 review
ENGR2701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 2 · A 13 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3