AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hema Nadkarni

MATH200 · MATH222 · 91577MATH200 · MATH811 · MATH241 · MATH120 · MATH225 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
70.97%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

She is a strong choice for students who want a and are willing to keep up with homework and ask for help.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring math teacherClear with helpGenerous gradingTest heavyMixed pacing
  • Most students praise her kindness, patience, and willingness to help, especially in statistics and in-person math classes.
  • The main risks are fast pacing, unclear slides, test-heavy structure, and .
  • Grades can be forgiving when students keep up, ask questions, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is realistic because and support is strong, but students still need to keep up with , and practice.

and supportive, while online reviews are more split and describe some sections as fast or confusing.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

Math and statistics content can be challenging, but many students say she makes it clearer when they attend and ask for help.

, while online classes show greater risk from pacing and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but many comments imply missing class makes learning much harder.

, while online reviews focus more on pacing and tests.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students recommend her for care, patience, and , though and fast pacing.

are more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Many students describe forgiving grading, dropped scores, , fair tests, or .

Format shift

, while online reviews are more mixed.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload varies from manageable practice and , and test-heavy pacing.

Format shift

Online summer and lower-level math reviews mention heavier pacing, while in-person workload varies by course.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most students describe her as caring, patient, and helpful, but , and weak explanations.

Format shift

, while online feedback contains more complaints about pacing and clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Reviews frequently mention tests, finals, practice tests, quizzes, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats are test heavy, with online reviews especially focused on tests and timed pacing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing , and strong statistics instruction, though some students dislike pacing or lecture style.

Main concern

Missing class or falling behind can hurt because examples and .

What students said

“THIS IS THE !!!! SHE IS BETTER THAN ALL THE OTHERS!!!!”
MATH200
“missing a day of the class was terrible.”
MATH225
“Out of all the stats teachers at CSM, she is the most forgiving and !”
MATH200

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split, with and manageable while others describe summer or lower-level math sections as , and test heavy.

Main concern

Online students may need to self-teach when pacing is fast or .

What students said

“An A is possible; it just requires a little more effort.”
MATH200
“I never understood what she was trying to teach, barely gave time for ”
MATH120
“The as the real test except slightly different words and number values.”
MATH200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear mostly standard and sometimes student-friendly through practice tests and review hints, but reviews .

Practice testsTestsFinalPop quizzesStraightforward tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and hints, but they do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Straightforward testsCumulative finalTest reviewsPractice tests
“ .”
MATH241
“Also clearly goes over whats on the .”
MATH200
“ if you do the .”
MATH200

Online

, and pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Practice testsTestsPop quizzesLimited test time
“The as the real test except slightly different words and number values.”
MATH200
“barely gave time for ”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She truly cares about you and wants you to pass!!! stats is the hardest for me and so well!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She truly cares about you and wants you to pass!!! stats is the hardest for me and so well!!”

⚖️

78/100

“Out of all the stats teachers at CSM, she is the most forgiving and !”

🧪

62/100

“The as the real test except slightly different words and number values.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made sure that each student understand the concept and .
  • She would literally run around the classroom to help with .
  • she is ready to help but she is so fast with the material and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • An A is possible; it just requires a little more effort.
  • , and helped us as much as possible.
  • Lots of homework and assignments.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • .
  • The as the real test except slightly different words and number values.
  • Her study guides for the and the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews span many years, courses, and formats, with enough detail to identify consistent strengths and risks.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH20022 reviews
MATH1206 reviews
MATH8115 reviews
MATH2413 reviews
MATH2252 reviews
Show 2 more courses
91577MATH2001 review
MATH2221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 1 · A 11 · A- 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2