AI Rate Professor

Psychology

James O'Connell Clifford Jr

PSYC105 · PSYC100 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you are highly independent and , and harsh grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh gradingHeavy workloadConfusing assignmentsLecture heavyPoor feedback
  • , and harsh grading.
  • The workload is repeatedly called heavy, long, and poorly connected to course material.
  • , but it is outweighed by many recent negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even when some students earned decent grades, comments , and heavy effort.

Online reviews emphasize confusing assignments and , while and failed free responses.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students repeatedly say lectures, assignments, quizzes, and and hard to connect to the material.

Both online and , though one older in-person review found the class intellectually valuable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and some sections appear asynchronous or video-based.

Online evidence centers on lecture videos, while in-person reviews mention lectures and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Most students explicitly warn others not to take the class because the , and .

Online reviews are uniformly negative, while positive exception.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Multiple students call him a tough or and report failed assignments despite effort.

Format shift

Both formats mention harsh grading, with online and and free responses.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tons of , and convoluted tasks.

Format shift

Online reviews stress long confusing assignments, while and difficult quizzes.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Most students describe lectures as boring, incomprehensible, repetitive, and poorly connected to assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews are strongly negative, while older praise of his intellectual depth.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and lecture-based work rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on assignments and feedback, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, messy materials, difficult quizzes, and poor learning value, with one older positive review.

Main concern

Most , and heavy homework.

What students said

“He is very repetitive, video lectures are incomprehensible, and he grades harshly.”
PSYC100
“he gave a ton of homework, and ”
PSYC100
“If you want a learning-centered environment, then his class is for you.”
PSYC100

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing long lecture , and regret taking the course.

Main concern

Students say assignments and and .

What students said

“Save yourself, and .”
PSYC105
“the and ”
PSYC100
“so much work and such a ”
PSYC105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult quizzes and , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Difficult QuizzesFree Response AssignmentsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and free response assignments, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Difficult QuizzesFree Response Assignments
“ ”
PSYC100
“ ”
PSYC100

Online

Online reviews mention assignments and grading but do not clearly prove exam format, webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

No Clear Exam Policy Evidence
“the and ”
PSYC100
“lectures are boring and ”
PSYC105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save yourself, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“The video lectures seem like torture and they drag.”

⚖️

12/100

“so much work and such a have ever gotten.”

📚 Workload

10/100

“he gave a ton of homework, and ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“Do NOT SIGN UP FOR HIS CLASS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The video lectures seem like torture and they drag.
  • He is very repetitive, video lectures are incomprehensible
  • lectures are boring and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so much work and such a
  • he gave a ton of homework, and
  • and too crazy hard bc they dont make sense

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • Save yourself, and .
  • .
  • Do NOT SIGN UP FOR HIS CLASS.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because nine reviews across multiple years and formats show a consistent negative pattern, despite one older positive outlier.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PSYC1006 reviews
PSYC1053 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1