AI Rate Professor

Architecture

George Sun

ARCH220 · ARCH210 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Take George Sun only if you are serious about architecture and ready for , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDemanding studio workloadTough gradingHelpful if you work hardUnclear assignmentsArchitecture-focused rigor
  • The class is consistently described as demanding, time-heavy, and hard to earn an A in.
  • In-person reviews are mixed but include strong praise for , and care when students put in effort.
  • Online reviews , and exhausting assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears to require major time investment, strong presentation, and sustained effort rather than simple completion.

harsher and in-person reviews framing the effort as more rewarding.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

Architecture studio work is described as rigorous, project-heavy, and conceptually at times.

, while in-person students emphasize demanding but purposeful architecture training.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

pass, and studio participation appears important.

Attendance evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, while online reviews do not clearly prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students recommend him mainly for serious architecture majors who want rigorous preparation, but others report confusion and frustration.

In-person recommendations are mixed but sometimes strong, while online reviews are consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students repeatedly describe tough grading, hard A conditions, and .

Format shift

adding concern about favoritism.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and a studio workload that feels far above the unit count.

Format shift

Both online and , though in-person students sometimes see it as part of architecture training.

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Teaching is sharply mixed, with praise for feedback and care in person but and lack of guidance online.

Format shift

In-person teaching looks inconsistent but sometimes valuable, while online teaching is described as unclear and unsupported.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and presentation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

where motivated architecture students can learn a lot but many struggle with grading and clarity.

Main concern

The workload and helpful.

What students said

“This is not an easy class, but it can be fun!”
ARCH220
“Most of the so if your looking for an easy A this is definitely not that class.”
ARCH220

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly negative, with students describing unclear , and a poor learning environment.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves while handling a heavy workload.

What students said

“ meet deadlines.”
ARCH210
“For a year, I learned nothing from him, but myself.”
ARCH210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears mainly project-based.

Exam policy not clearly provenProject-focused assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Exam policy not clearly provenProject-focused assessment
“Most of the so if your looking for an easy A this is definitely not that class.”
ARCH220

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is not an easy class, but it can be fun!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“George is always willing to help those who put in effort.”

📚 Workload Intensity

12/100

“ meet deadlines.”

⚖️

24/100

“Most of the so if your looking for an easy A this is definitely not that class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • George is always willing to help those who put in effort.
  • For a year, I learned nothing from him, but myself.
  • No idea what he wants..

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is not an easy class, but it can be fun!
  • It's not easy on grades and you should put lot of time for his class otherwise you will face hard time.
  • a the way you present rather then the work you do..

Theme 3

🏛️ About Architecture Fit

  • George teaches architecture as rigorously as possible at CSM, to prepare people to transfer, and completely reshaped my work ethic.
  • if you are majoring in Architecture.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews span many years, include both formats, and consistently support the heavy workload and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ARCH2204 reviews
ARCH2103 reviews
447701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1