AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Larry Pon

ACTG181 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught courseLong timed testsTough graderLots of homeworkUnclear assignment guidance
  • The single review says the online course relies heavily on the online book instead of direct teaching.
  • Tests are described as long, time-pressured, and unrealistic.
  • The evidence is only one online review, so confidence is limited but strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because the , and long timed tests.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course feels challenging because students must learn details from the book with limited assignment guidance.

Only the online format is represented.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

The only evidence is online, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The review is strongly negative because instruction, assignments, and .

Recommendation evidence comes only from one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The tough grader tag and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The review explicitly reports lots of , and demanding tests.

Format shift

All workload evidence is from the online course.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The reviewer says and relies on the book for details.

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence is available.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

The review mentions both assignments and .

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from the online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review and homework, and overly long tests with too little time.

Main concern

while .

What students said

“Does not teach how to approach the assignments and relies on online book to teach the details”
ACTG181
“ ”
ACTG181

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because online tests are described as long, time-pressured, and unrealistic.

Long Online TestsInsufficient TimeUnrealistic Test Expectations

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online tests are described as long with insufficient time, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Long Online TestsInsufficient TimeUnrealistic Test Expectations
“ ”
ACTG181
“ ”
ACTG181

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ; focused on lots of questions over giving us enough time to show our understanding; unrealistic test expectations”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and testing. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Does not teach how to approach the assignments and relies on online book to teach the details”

🧪

25/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Load

25/100

“Could be more mindful of his students' experience”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not teach how to approach the assignments and relies on online book to teach the details
  • Tested on things he did not know how to answer

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only one , so the but not broadly verified.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACTG1811 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1