AI Rate Professor

Business

Patricia Stokke

MGMT154 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Only take her online if and possible strict grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderTime Consuming WorkRepeated AssignmentsExtra CostsOnline Course
  • The course work is not described as intellectually hard, but it is time consuming.
  • , while another earned an A- and .
  • There is limited evidence, so the rating is uncertain.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but the work is time consuming and one .

All evidence comes from online reviews; there are no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The content itself sounds self-explanatory, but the workload and .

All evidence comes from online reviews; there are no in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention participation matters but do .

All evidence comes from online reviews, and they do not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends on whether students can tolerate time-consuming repeated work and .

All evidence comes from online reviews, with one very negative and one moderately positive review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

The to get, though the sample is small.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The work is described as self-explanatory but time consuming, with .

Format shift

All workload evidence is from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Reviews give little direct teaching praise and , and repeated assignments.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is from online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Comments .

Format shift

All assessment evidence is from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe self-explanatory but and repeated paid assignments.

Main concern

and repeated assignments can make the course frustrating.

What students said

“Work was self explanatory - not difficult but time consuming.”
MGMT154
“PATRICIA hands out full points on assignments like the chances of seeing the other end of a black hole alive.”
MGMT154

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an format.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Work was self explanatory - not difficult but time consuming.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in grading and assignments. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

22/100

“PATRICIA hands out full points on assignments like the chances of seeing the other end of a black hole alive.”

📚 Workload

30/100

“Work was self explanatory - not difficult but time consuming.”

💵 Course Costs

32/100

“One costed a $32 fee each time which bothered me A LOT.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • PATRICIA hands out full points on assignments like the chances of seeing the other end of a black hole alive.
  • Work was self explanatory - not difficult but time consuming.

Theme 2

🧾 About Assignments

  • .
  • I did some of the exact assignments 3 times because of this.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only and they focus on different issues.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MGMT1542 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1