AI Rate Professor

Multimedia

Jennifer Aquino

DGME100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if possible, but be cautious with online sections because the limited online evidence is negative.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEngaging lecturesAccommodatingInteresting assignmentsMandatory attendanceFormat-dependent grading
  • In-person students strongly praise her teaching, activities, support, and interesting assignments.
  • The only online review is highly negative and reports unclear directions and .
  • Getting an A seems realistic in person with attention and effort, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

In person, an A looks reachable with attention and effort, but the online review warns that .

In-person reviews support EasyA with effort, while the only .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course and engaging activities, though weekly reading and projects require effort.

and engaging content, while the online review focuses on confusing directions rather than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One in-person , and no other review clearly proves flexibility.

section; online attendance evidence is not discussed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and support, but the online review is a serious caution.

, while the only online review says not to take the course.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but the online review reports incoherent grading and a .

Format shift

, while online evidence is negative and lowers confidence.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Students mention , and two major projects, but describe the work as manageable.

Format shift

, while the online review does not describe workload clearly.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

In-person students describe her as engaging, caring, accommodating, and passionate about teaching, despite one poor online review.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is excellent, while the single online review is negative about course directions.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize assignments, activities, group projects, an advertisement, and a speech rather than exams.

Format shift

and projects, while online assessment details are unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are very positive, describing , and an achievable A with effort.

Main concern

late-start section.

What students said

“Easy A if you pay attention and put in the effort.”
DGME-100
“Her lectures are really fun and her in-class activities are really engaging.”
DGME-100
“ .”
DGME-100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is negative and and .

Main concern

Poor directions and of the student's control.

What students said

“ridiculously bad syllabus directions and .”
DGME-100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and projects, but do not clearly prove exam rules, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Projects Mentioned
“ and a speech.”
DGME-100

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! If you have the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is there because she loves teaching.”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“Easy A if you pay attention and put in the effort.”

⚠️ Online Risk

55/100

“ridiculously bad syllabus directions and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's super accommodating, loves teaching and her students
  • Her lectures are really fun and her in-class activities are really engaging.
  • She was a journalist for many years, so you will learn a lot

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • Easy A if you pay attention and put in the effort.
  • There were about 1-3 assignments per week that weren't bad, just required a bit of reading.
  • and a speech.

Theme 3

🌐 About Format Differences

  • At risk of a low grade that results out of your control
  • This was a hybrid course and a late .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 4 reviews are available, with strong in-person agreement but only one negative online review.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

DGME-1004 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values