AI Rate Professor

English

Sara Lawrence

IDST101 · ENG838 · ENGL100 · ENGL838 · ENG100 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a writing-focused English class and are willing to revise, participate, and ask for help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportive Writing CoachEssay HeavyHigh ExpectationsFair But InconsistentDiscussion Focused
  • Many students praise her as , and .
  • Negative reviews focus on unclear , and strict expectations.
  • The experience depends strongly on whether students engage in class, use office hours, and keep up with essays.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A strong grade is possible, but students often need to write a lot, revise, participate, and use her help.

The online evidence is only one positive review, while performance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is manageable for many students but writing expectations, readings, and .

Online evidence is too limited, while , and high expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance and participation appear important, with one review explicitly saying she is strict with attendance.

The only online review warns skipping class hurts performance, while and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

She is recommended by many students for support and fair essay coaching, but a notable and workload.

Online evidence is positive but minimal, while and severe complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

, but others report unclear standards and .

Format shift

The online review says she gives good feedback, while and tough grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload is writing-heavy, with essays, reading, participation, and some reports of .

Format shift

Online workload evidence is limited, while , and homework.

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

Most students find her supportive, engaging, and helpful, but and .

Format shift

The one online review is positive, while but include several severe negative experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is mainly essay and writing based, with only scattered mentions of quizzes, tests, or finals.

Format shift

, while the online review does not provide enough assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive but sharply split, with strong praise for support and and heavy writing.

Main concern

and essays demanding.

What students said

“Most of your .”
ENG100
“ enough in the class time.”
ENGL100
“ .”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive but notes that she can feel intimidating.

Main concern

Evidence is too limited to judge online consistency.

What students said

“Shes a good teacher and gives good ideas and feedback.”
IDST101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but assessment appears mostly essay-based with occasional finals or quizzes mentioned.

Essay-Based GradesStrict Finals MentionedNo Quizzes Mentioned In One Review

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention essays as the main grade source and scattered finals or quizzes, but .

Essay-Based GradesStrict Finals MentionedNo Quizzes Mentioned In One Review
“Most of your .”
ENG100
“strict Finals”
ENGL100
“ .”
ENG100

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“High expectations, but supportive.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format limits; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

75/100

“ . High expectations, but supportive.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

66/100

“ .”

✍️ Writing Workload

35/100

“Most of your .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She is amazing. Her lectures and exercises really help the .
  • and dedicated.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Essays

  • Most of your .
  • Her workload is pretty heavy but it helps so much in .
  • Lots of writing needed to be done and expect you to write out the .

Theme 3

⚖️ And Feedback

  • Essays are graded fairly and .
  • enough in the class time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 24 reviews over many years with detailed but .

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG10010 reviews
ENG8385 reviews
ENGL1004 reviews
1142 reviews
ENGL8382 reviews
Show 1 more courses
IDST1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 6 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1